Derivation of Relativisitic Doppler effect with angle

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on deriving the formula for the relativistic Doppler effect for a receiver moving at an angle θ away from a planar light source. Participants suggest using the phase function of a plane wave and Lorentz transformations to analyze the frequency observed by the receiver. Key steps include expressing the world line of the observer, determining the change in phase along this line, and calculating the proper time passed for the observer. The conversation emphasizes the importance of understanding light as a wave and the implications of angle θ on the Doppler effect.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Lorentz transformations
  • Familiarity with wave phase functions
  • Basic knowledge of the relativistic Doppler effect
  • Concept of proper time in relativity
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the relativistic Doppler effect formula
  • Learn about wave phase functions in the context of special relativity
  • Explore the application of Lorentz transformations in wave mechanics
  • Investigate the effects of angle θ on the Doppler shift
USEFUL FOR

Students and educators in physics, particularly those studying special relativity and wave mechanics, as well as anyone interested in the mathematical derivation of the relativistic Doppler effect.

Arman777
Insights Author
Gold Member
Messages
2,163
Reaction score
191

Homework Statement


Derive the formula for the Doppler effect for a receiver traveling at an angle theta away from a planar source

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


[/B]
I thought that we can assume that the wavelength has two components ##λ_x## and ##λ_y## where

##λ_x = ct+vtcosθ## and I am not sure about ##λ_y##. Maybe ##λ_y = \sqrt {(ct)^2+ (vtsinθ)^2)}##

I am not sure how to start or approach please help.

Note : I cannot use wave equation.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Are you going to model light as a wave or as massless particles, with energy and momentum?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Arman777
PeroK said:
Are you going to model light as a wave or as massless particles, with energy and momentum?
I am not sure actually. Why its important ?. We can't use four vectors or etc.. we didnt learn them.. We can use basic stuff like lorentz transformation only actually.
 
Arman777 said:
I am not sure actually. Why its important ?. We can't use four vectors or etc.. we didnt learn them.. We can use basic stuff like lorentz transformation only actually.

Okay, so you can't use the energy-momentum transformation. What about expressing light as a plane wave?
 
I suggest the following:
  • Write down the phase function of the wave. You can assume a plane wave moving in the ##x##-direction for this purpose.
  • Write down an expression for the world line of the observer.
  • For a small change in ##t##, determine the change ##d\phi## in the phase function along the world line of the observer.
  • Determine the proper time ##ds## passed for the observer in the same small time difference.
  • The frequency observed by the observer is ##d\phi/ds##.
  • You can find the original frequency by doing the same for the emitter.
 
Orodruin said:
I suggest the following:
  • Write down the phase function of the wave. You can assume a plane wave moving in the ##x##-direction for this purpose.
  • Write down an expression for the world line of the observer.
  • For a small change in ##t##, determine the change ##d\phi## in the phase function along the world line of the observer.
  • Determine the proper time ##ds## passed for the observer in the same small time difference.
  • The frequency observed by the observer is ##d\phi/ds##.
  • You can find the original frequency by doing the same for the emitter.
Thats kind of hard for me to do. I can try step by step tho but I am not sure I can find it. Is there a simpler way ? Or is there a way without writing plane-wave equation ? . I find a online derviation and it uses planes waves and lorentz transformation. Probably this is what you are trying to describe.

I
 
The wording of the problem would seem to allow starting with the expression for the relativistic Doppler shift head-on. Then just figure out the effect of theta.
 
rude man said:
The wording of the problem would seem to allow starting with the expression for the relativistic Doppler shift head-on. Then just figure out the effect of theta.
How..
 
Arman777 said:
How..
First, you realize they're talking about light waves, right? I mean, couldn't be sound waves at relativistic speeds.

So how about using the relativistic expression for straight-back light travel (not at an angle to the source-receiver line), then considering how the effective rate of travel as seen by the receiver is impacted by an angle other than zero? Looks like plain old trig to me - but that's just me. :rolleyes:
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
930
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K