Derivation of Schrodinger's equation in momentum space

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the derivation of Schrödinger's equation in momentum space, specifically transitioning between two equations labeled (3.171) and (3.172). Participants are examining the mathematical steps involved and the implications of treating momentum as an operator versus a constant.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the validity of certain integrals and the treatment of momentum as an operator versus a constant. There are attempts to clarify the steps leading to the equations and the implications of integration by parts. Some participants question the assumptions made in the derivation and the treatment of the wave function in different spaces.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants providing insights and corrections to each other's reasoning. Some have reached an understanding of the steps involved, while others continue to seek clarification on specific points, such as the transition of momentum from an operator to a constant.

Contextual Notes

There are references to the original author's potential omissions in the derivation steps and the implications of the Schrödinger equation's linearity. Participants also note the importance of boundary conditions and the behavior of wave functions at infinity.

Happiness
Messages
686
Reaction score
30

Homework Statement


Screen Shot 2015-12-04 at 4.39.10 pm.png

How do you get from (3.171) to (3.172)? In particular, why is

##\int e^{-ip.r/{\hbar}}\frac{p_{op}^2}{2m}\Psi(r,t)\,dr=\int\frac{p_{op}^2}{2m}[e^{-ip.r/{\hbar}}\Psi(r,t)]\,dr##? ##\,\,\,\,\,##-- (1)

Homework Equations


Screen Shot 2015-12-04 at 4.39.54 pm.png

Screen Shot 2015-12-04 at 4.40.19 pm.png


The Attempt at a Solution


For (1) to be true, it must be true that
##\int\frac{\partial ^2}{\partial x^2}[e^{-ip.x/{\hbar}}\Psi(r,t)]\,dr=\int e^{-ip.x/{\hbar}}\frac{\partial ^2}{\partial x^2}\Psi(r,t)\,dr##. ##\,\,\,\,\,##-- (2)

Using integration by parts and the fact that ##\Psi(r,t)=0## at infinity, I am able to show that (2) is true provided

##\int\frac{-ip}{\hbar}e^{-ipx/\hbar}\frac{\partial}{\partial x}\Psi(r,t)\,dr=0## ##\,\,\,\,\,##-- (3) or

##\int\Psi(r,t)\,(\frac{-ip}{\hbar})^2e^{-ipx/\hbar}\,dr=0##.##\,\,\,\,\,##-- (4)

But I don't know how (3) or (4) is true?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The author has left out steps leading to (3.171). The way it is written there, p is already an operator in momentum space, meaning that it is a simple multiplication.

Edit: Maybe it is not missing steps, but the author has taken the problem backward. I would start with the Schrödinger equation for ##\Psi(\mathbf{r},t)##, write ##\Psi(\mathbf{r},t)## in terms of ##\Phi(\mathbf{p},t)##, and get the Schrödinger equation for ##\Phi(\mathbf{p},t)##.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Happiness
DrClaude said:
The author has left out steps leading to (3.171). The way it is written there, p is already an operator in momentum space, meaning that it is a simple multiplication.

Edit: Maybe it is not missing steps, but the author has taken the problem backward. I would start with the Schrödinger equation for ##\Psi(\mathbf{r},t)##, write ##\Psi(\mathbf{r},t)## in terms of ##\Phi(\mathbf{p},t)##, and get the Schrödinger equation for ##\Phi(\mathbf{p},t)##.

Since the integration in (3.171) is done with respect to r, shouldn't p still be an operator in configuration space?

How I see the steps leading to (3.171) is as follows:

Since ##\Psi(r,t)## satisfies the Schrödinger equation, any linear combination of ##\Psi##'s satisfies the Schrödinger equation too by the principle of superposition (or by the linearity of the operators in the Schrödinger equation).
 
Oh I got it now. The author used

##H\Psi(r,t)=E\Psi(r,t)=[\frac{p^2}{2m}+V(r,t)]\Psi(r,t)##.

So the p##^2## in (3.171) is a constant and not an operator.
 
Happiness said:
Oh I got it now. The author used

##H\Psi(r,t)=E\Psi(r,t)=[\frac{p^2}{2m}+V(r,t)]\Psi(r,t)##.

So the p##^2## in (3.171) is a constant and not an operator.
In the equation you wrote, p2 has got to be an operator. It is in momentum space that it is a number.

I'm still trying to figure how to best approach the way it is presented in your book.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Happiness
I think I got it.

##(2\pi\hbar)^{-3/2}\int e^{-ip.r/\hbar}\frac{p_{op}^2}{2m}\Psi(r,t)\,dr\\##

first substitute ##\Psi(r,t)## in terms of ##\Phi(p',t)##
##=(2\pi\hbar)^{-3/2}\int e^{-ip.r/\hbar}\frac{p_{op}^2}{2m}(2\pi\hbar)^{-3/2}\int e^{ip'.r/\hbar}\Phi(p',t)\,dp'\,dr\\##

then group the exponential terms together
##=\int\frac{p_{op}^2}{2m}(2\pi\hbar)^{-3}\int e^{i(p'-p).r/\hbar}\Phi(p',t)\,dp'\,dr\\##

since ##p_{op}## and the r integration commute, we have
##=\frac{p_{op}^2}{2m}\int(2\pi\hbar)^{-3}\int e^{i(p'-p).r/\hbar}\Phi(p',t)\,dp'\,dr\\##

since the r integration and the p' integration commute, we have
##=\frac{p_{op}^2}{2m}\int(2\pi\hbar)^{-3}\int e^{i(p'-p).r/\hbar}\,dr\,\Phi(p',t)\,dp'\\##

next perform the r integration
##=\frac{p_{op}^2}{2m}\int\delta(p'-p)\Phi(p',t)\,dp'\\
=\frac{p_{op}^2}{2m}\Phi(p,t)\\
##
 
Last edited:
I still have one unresolved question:

How does ##p_{op}^2## change from being ##-\hbar^2\nabla^2## to being ##p^2##, where ##p## is a number? At which step does it occur and why?
 
Happiness said:
I think I got it.

##(2\pi\hbar)^{-3/2}\int e^{-ip.r/\hbar}\frac{p_{op}^2}{2m}\Psi(r,t)\,dr\\##

first substitute ##\Psi(r,t)## in terms of ##\Phi(p',t)##
##=(2\pi\hbar)^{-3/2}\int e^{-ip.r/\hbar}\frac{p_{op}^2}{2m}(2\pi\hbar)^{-3/2}\int e^{ip'.r/\hbar}\Phi(p',t)\,dp'\,dr\\##

then group the exponential terms together
##=\int\frac{p_{op}^2}{2m}(2\pi\hbar)^{-3}\int e^{i(p'-p).r/\hbar}\Phi(p',t)\,dp'\,dr\\##

since ##p_{op}## and the r integration commute, we have
##=\frac{p_{op}^2}{2m}\int(2\pi\hbar)^{-3}\int e^{i(p'-p).r/\hbar}\Phi(p',t)\,dp'\,dr\\##

You cannot pull ##p_{or}^2## outside of the integral over r, since it is acting on that variable! You must apply it to the exponential and therefore it will generate a factor ##p^2## where now p is the variable, not an operator.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Happiness
I see the mistake.

##(2\pi\hbar)^{-3/2}\int e^{-ip.r/\hbar}\frac{p_{op}^2}{2m}\Psi(r,t)\,dr\\##

first substitute ##\Psi(r,t)## in terms of ##\Phi(p',t)##
##=(2\pi\hbar)^{-3/2}\int e^{-ip.r/\hbar}\frac{p_{op}^2}{2m}(2\pi\hbar)^{-3/2}\int e^{ip'.r/\hbar}\Phi(p',t)\,dp'\,dr\\##

then group the exponential terms together (This step is wrong because ##p_{op}^2## is acting on ##r## but the exponential term has ##r## so they don't commute.)
##=\int\frac{p_{op}^2}{2m}(2\pi\hbar)^{-3}\int e^{i(p'-p).r/\hbar}\Phi(p',t)\,dp'\,dr\\##

instead it should be
##=(2\pi\hbar)^{-3/2}\int e^{-ip.r/\hbar}(2\pi\hbar)^{-3/2}\int\frac{p_{op}^2}{2m}e^{ip'.r/\hbar}\Phi(p',t)\,dp'\,dr\\##
##=(2\pi\hbar)^{-3/2}\int e^{-ip.r/\hbar}(2\pi\hbar)^{-3/2}\int\frac{p'^2}{2m}e^{ip'.r/\hbar}\Phi(p',t)\,dp'\,dr\\##

since the r integration and the p' integration commute, we have
##=\int\frac{p'^2}{2m}(2\pi\hbar)^{-3}\int e^{i(p'-p).r/\hbar}\,dr\,\Phi(p',t)\,dp'\\##

next perform the r integration
##=\int\frac{p'^2}{2m}\delta(p'-p)\Phi(p',t)\,dp'\\
=\frac{p^2}{2m}\Phi(p,t)\\
##
 
  • #10
Happiness said:
I see the mistake.

##(2\pi\hbar)^{-3/2}\int e^{-ip.r/\hbar}\frac{p_{op}^2}{2m}\Psi(r,t)\,dr\\##

first substitute ##\Psi(r,t)## in terms of ##\Phi(p',t)##
##=(2\pi\hbar)^{-3/2}\int e^{-ip.r/\hbar}\frac{p_{op}^2}{2m}(2\pi\hbar)^{-3/2}\int e^{ip'.r/\hbar}\Phi(p',t)\,dp'\,dr\\##

then group the exponential terms together (This step is wrong because ##p_{op}^2## is acting on ##r## but the exponential term has ##r## so they don't commute.)
##=\int\frac{p_{op}^2}{2m}(2\pi\hbar)^{-3}\int e^{i(p'-p).r/\hbar}\Phi(p',t)\,dp'\,dr\\##

instead it should be
##=(2\pi\hbar)^{-3/2}\int e^{-ip.r/\hbar}(2\pi\hbar)^{-3/2}\int\frac{p_{op}^2}{2m}e^{ip'.r/\hbar}\Phi(p',t)\,dp'\,dr\\##
##=(2\pi\hbar)^{-3/2}\int e^{-ip.r/\hbar}(2\pi\hbar)^{-3/2}\int\frac{p'^2}{2m}e^{ip'.r/\hbar}\Phi(p',t)\,dp'\,dr\\##

since the r integration and the p' integration commute, we have
##=\int\frac{p'^2}{2m}(2\pi\hbar)^{-3}\int e^{i(p'-p).r/\hbar}\,dr\,\Phi(p',t)\,dp'\\##

next perform the r integration
##=\int\frac{p'^2}{2m}\delta(p'-p)\Phi(p',t)\,dp'\\
=\frac{p^2}{2m}\Phi(p,t)\\
##
Perfect!
 
  • #11
Hey I was wondering what textbook you were using for this question:And for the final solution, I had a convolution in there for the last integral in (3.172): V(p) * Psi(p,t)?

Cheers
 
  • #12
rdhill13 said:
Hey I was wondering what textbook you were using for this question:And for the final solution, I had a convolution in there for the last integral in (3.172): V(p) * Psi(p,t)?

Cheers

The thread is four years old!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
627
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
362
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
4K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
957
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K