Derivation of the Laue Equation -- Problem with path difference

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the derivation of the Laue equation, specifically addressing the path difference represented as Δs = Δs1 - Δs2. Participants clarify that the signs of the dot products between the vectors T and s0, and T and s' are crucial for understanding the path difference. The angle between these vectors determines whether the dot product is positive or negative, impacting the overall derivation. The conclusion is that while the textbook may present a confusing sign convention, the magnitude of the path difference remains valid.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of vector mathematics, specifically dot products
  • Familiarity with the Laue equation in crystallography
  • Knowledge of the Bragg equation and its derivation
  • Basic principles of wave interference and path differences
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the Laue equation in detail
  • Learn about vector dot products and their geometric interpretations
  • Examine the Bragg equation and compare it with the Laue equation
  • Explore examples of path differences in wave optics
USEFUL FOR

Students of physics, particularly those studying crystallography and wave optics, as well as educators seeking to clarify the concepts of vector mathematics in relation to the Laue equation.

Lindsayyyy
Messages
215
Reaction score
0
Hi everyone

Homework Statement


I'm trying to understand the Laue equation but I have problems unterstanding the derivation, especially one part in my textbook about the path difference (see attachment)



The Attempt at a Solution



My textbook says that the path difference here is:
\Delta s = \vec T \hat{s_0} - \vec T \hat{s}

But why is there a minus? I thought there has to be a plus (like in the derivation of the Bragg equation) because when I look at the picture in the attachment, the ray which is on bottom has to travel dS1 and dS2 in addition. Where is my mistake?

Thanks for your help everyone. If anything is unclear just ask, I know my English is not the best.
 

Attachments

  • laue.png
    laue.png
    3.2 KB · Views: 1,535
Physics news on Phys.org
Hello.

Note the signs of the dot products ##\vec{T} \cdot \hat{s}_0## and ##\vec{T} \cdot \hat{s}'##.

In particular, for your diagram, is ##\Delta s_1 = \vec{T} \cdot \hat{s}_0## a positive quantity or a negative quantity?
 
I think it's positive. I didn't create the sketch, I took it out of my textbook. I still don't understand why dS2 is negative.
 
Lindsayyyy said:
I think it's positive. I didn't create the sketch, I took it out of my textbook. I still don't understand why dS2 is negative.

What can you say about the angle between ##\vec{T}## and ##\vec{s}_0##? (Not a precise value, just a range). What can you say about the dot product between vectors with an angle in that range?
 
I know when the angle is between 0 and 90 degrees the dot product is positive. for 90 to 180 degrees it's negative. This may sound stupid, but I have a problem understanding this when I take a look at the sketch because the tip of the S0 vector touches the T vector. How do I cope with this? It's quite embarrassing that I don't know how I calculate a dot product this way, but I've never stumpled upon such a problem. I add an attachment so you know what I mean by "when the tip of one vector touches the other".

Thanks for your help
 

Attachments

  • vec.png
    vec.png
    421 bytes · Views: 700
The angle between vectors as it occurs in the cross product, \vec{x} \cdot \vec{y}=|\vec{x}| |\vec{y}| \cos \theta with \theta \in [0,\pi] is defined to be the angle between the vectors with their starting points coinciding, i.e., in your figure you have to parallel shift one of the vectors such that it's starting point coincides with the starting point of the other vector. Then the angle at this pivot point is the one relevant in the scalar product! In your drawing this angle is obviously between \pi/2 and \pi and thus the scalar product id negative (because the cosine is negative in this range).
 
So the dot product of T and S0 in my first attachment is negative and the dot product of T and S' is positive? If that's the case I think my textbook is wrong :o
 
Lindsayyyy said:
So the dot product of T and S0 in my first attachment is negative and the dot product of T and S' is positive?

Yes.

If that's the case I think my textbook is wrong :o

You might be right. In the diagram, Δs = Δs1 - Δs2 would be a negative number, whereas the diagram seems to be deriving an expression for the positive extra distance that the bottom ray travels relative to the top ray.

But note that the magnitude of Δs = Δs1 - Δs2 does give the correct magnitude of the path difference of the two rays. So, it depends on how the text makes use of the expression for Δs as to whether the overall derivation of the Laue equation is wrong.
 
Alright, I got it now. Thank your very much for your help
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
18
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K