MHB Derivative of 2^x - Is it 2^x ln(x) or ln(2)?

  • Thread starter Thread starter tmt1
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Derivative
Click For Summary
The derivative of the function y=2^x is correctly expressed as y'=2^x ln(2). Initial confusion arose from a note suggesting y'=2^x ln(x), which is incorrect. The derivation confirms that using the properties of logarithms leads to the correct result. Both methods presented in the discussion validate that the derivative involves ln(2) rather than ln(x). The consensus is that the correct derivative is y'=ln(2) 2^x.
tmt1
Messages
230
Reaction score
0
Hi,

In my notes I put down that

y=2^x
y'=2^x ln(x)

However, I seem to remember that it is in fact

y'=2^x ln(2)

Which one is correct?

Thanks,

Tim
 
Physics news on Phys.org
\begin{align*}
y&=2^x \\
\ln(y)&= \ln(2^x) \\
\ln(y)&= x \ln(2) \\
\frac{y'}{y}&=\ln(2) \\
y'&= y \ln(2) \\
y'&= \ln(2) \, 2^x.
\end{align*}
 
Another way to view it (although I favor Ackbach's method) is:

$$y=2^x=e^{\ln\left(2^x \right)}=e^{x\ln(2)}$$

And so:

$$y'=e^{x\ln(2)}\cdot\ln(2)=\ln(2)2^x$$
 
Thread 'Problem with calculating projections of curl using rotation of contour'
Hello! I tried to calculate projections of curl using rotation of coordinate system but I encountered with following problem. Given: ##rot_xA=\frac{\partial A_z}{\partial y}-\frac{\partial A_y}{\partial z}=0## ##rot_yA=\frac{\partial A_x}{\partial z}-\frac{\partial A_z}{\partial x}=1## ##rot_zA=\frac{\partial A_y}{\partial x}-\frac{\partial A_x}{\partial y}=0## I rotated ##yz##-plane of this coordinate system by an angle ##45## degrees about ##x##-axis and used rotation matrix to...

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K