How to Derive the Dual Frame Vector in Terms of Connection Components?

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on deriving the derivative of a dual frame vector in terms of connection components using the relation between the dual frame vectors. The key equation presented is the application of the Leibniz rule, leading to the expression for the derivative, which involves the connection coefficients. There is confusion regarding the distinction between the derivatives of dual basis vectors and tangent basis vectors. The participant expresses uncertainty about how to incorporate connection components without relying on prior definitions. The conversation emphasizes the importance of correctly applying the mathematical principles to derive the desired expression.
BOAS
Messages
546
Reaction score
19

Homework Statement



Use the relation ##\langle \vec e^a, \vec e_b \rangle = \delta^a_b## and the Leibniz rule to give an expression for the derivative of a dual frame vector ##\frac{\partial \vec e_b}{\partial x^a}## in terms of the connexion components.

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution



I'm not sure how to do this, but this is what I've got so far:

##\partial_c \langle \vec e^a, \vec e_b \rangle = 0##

##\langle \partial_c \vec e^a, \vec e_b \rangle + \langle \vec e^a, \partial_c \vec e_b \rangle = 0##

##\langle -\Gamma^b_{dc} \vec e^d, \vec e_b \rangle + \langle \vec e^a, \Gamma^d_{bc} \vec e_d \rangle = 0##

##\Gamma^d_{bc}\langle \vec e^a, \vec e_d \rangle - \Gamma^b_{dc} \langle \vec e^d, \vec e_b \rangle = 0##
 
Physics news on Phys.org
BOAS said:
##\langle \partial_c \vec e^a, \vec e_b \rangle + \langle \vec e^a, \partial_c \vec e_b \rangle = 0##

##\langle -\Gamma^b_{dc} \vec e^d, \vec e_b \rangle + \langle \vec e^a, \Gamma^d_{bc} \vec e_d \rangle = 0##
Between these lines you are using what you are supposed to show ...
 
Orodruin said:
Between these lines you are using what you are supposed to show ...

##\frac{\partial \vec e_b}{\partial x^a} = \Gamma^c_{ba} \vec e_c## was presented as a definition to me, so I'm not sure how I can bring in the connection components without using that fact. (Though I do appreciate your point)
 
That is not the derivative of the dual basis vector, it is the derivative of the tangent basis vector.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
5K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
3K