(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({}); 1. The problem statement, all variables and given/known data

I have two questions. Both involve derivations from textbooks, not end-of-the-chapter problems. The two textbooks are Quantum Mechanics by Griffiths, and A Modern Approach to Quantum Mechanics by John Townsend.

My first question is about the discussion of Larmor precession found on page 180 of Griffiths. On that page, he calculates

[tex] \langle S_{x} \rangle = \frac{\hbar}{2}\mbox{sin}(\alpha)\mbox{cos}(\gamma B_{0}t) [/tex]

[tex] \langle S_{y} \rangle = -\frac{\hbar}{2}\mbox{sin}(\alpha)\mbox{sin}(\gamma B_{0}t) [/tex]

[tex] \langle S_{z} \rangle = \frac{\hbar}{2}\mbox{cos}(\alpha) [/tex]

and then states, "Evidently

[tex] \langle \bf{S} \rangle [/tex] is tilted at a constant angle [tex] \alpha [/tex] to the z-axis, and precesses about the field the field at the Larmor frequency [tex] \omega = \gamma B_{0} [/tex]..."

My question is how is does one know something about the expectation value of S from the expectation values of the components of S? Isn't it correct that

[tex] \langle {\bf S} \rangle \neq \langle S_{x} \rangle + \langle S_{y} \rangle + \langle S_{z} \rangle [/tex]

Is one supposed to just "see/know" that because the expectation values of the components of the spin have a trigonometric function of alpha, the expectation value of the spin is tilted at an angle alpha to the z-axis? Or, is this understanding similar to transforming/decomposing a vector from spherical coordinates to Cartesian coordinates (looking at figure 4.10 and decomposing S)? If that is the case, then I understand.

My second question involves the force on a magnetic dipole. On page 3 of Townsend, he states that, "If we call the direction in which the inhomogeneous magnetic field is large the z direction, we see that

[tex] F_{z} = \vec{\mu}\cdot \frac{\partial \vec{B}}{\partial z}\simeq \mu_{z}\frac{\partial B_{z}}{\partial z}" [/tex]

Here's my question. I know that [tex] \vec{F}=\nabla(\vec{\mu}\cdot\vec{B}) [/tex]

How does he pull the partial derivative into the dot product before first applying the dot product? Is it because the magnetic dipole moment is a constant in the z direction?

2. Relevant equations

[tex] \vec{F}=\nabla(\vec{\mu}\cdot\vec{B}) [/tex]

[tex] \vec{S}=S_{x}\hat{x}+S_{y}\hat{y}+S_{z}\hat{z} [/tex]

[tex] \langle S^{2} \rangle = \langle S_{x}^{2} \rangle + \langle S_{y}^{2} \rangle + \langle S_{z}^{2} \rangle [/tex]

3. The attempt at a solution

Refer to the problem description. Thank you for any help.

**Physics Forums | Science Articles, Homework Help, Discussion**

Dismiss Notice

Join Physics Forums Today!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Homework Help: Larmor Precession and Force on a Magnetic Dipole

**Physics Forums | Science Articles, Homework Help, Discussion**