Derivative of a power, algebra problem

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the calculation of the derivative of the polynomial function \( y = x^2 - x - 2 \). Participants explore the application of the power rule for derivatives, clarify algebraic expressions, and address misunderstandings in the differentiation process.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses confusion about the derivative calculation, specifically questioning how the derivative of \( y = x^2 - x - 2 \) results in \( 2x - 1 \).
  • Another participant challenges the initial approach, suggesting that the expression used for differentiation was not applied correctly and emphasizes the importance of accurate expression in mathematics.
  • A third participant points out that the derivative of a constant is zero, which is relevant to the problem at hand.
  • Several participants discuss the notation and clarify that \( x^{1-1} \) simplifies to 1, and that the derivative of a constant term should not be included in the differentiation process.
  • One participant suggests rewriting the polynomial in a way that clearly shows the powers of \( x \) to aid in differentiation.
  • Another participant reflects on their intention to understand the derivative calculation and acknowledges the misunderstanding in their original attempt.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the initial expressions used for differentiation, and there are multiple competing views on how to accurately express the derivative process. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the clarity of the initial approach.

Contextual Notes

Participants note limitations in the clarity of expressions and the importance of understanding the application of the power rule. There are unresolved aspects regarding the notation and the assumptions made in the differentiation process.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be useful for students learning about derivatives, particularly those struggling with the application of the power rule and the importance of clear mathematical expression.

username12345
Messages
47
Reaction score
0
I am unclear about an example of calculating a derivative in a book I am reading. I think the problem is my algebra.

[tex] \begin{flalign*}<br /> \mathrm{if} & & y & = & & x^n \\<br /> \mathrm{then} & & \frac{dy}{dx} & = & & nx^{n-1} \\<br /> \mathrm{so if} & & y & = & & x^2 - x - 2 \\<br /> \mathrm{then} & & \frac{dy}{dx} & = & & 2x - 1 \\<br /> \end{flalign*}[/tex]

I can't find how it ended up as [tex]2x - 1[/tex]. Here's is my attempt:

[tex] \begin{flalign*}<br /> y & = & & x^2 - x - 2 \\<br /> \frac{dy}{dx} & = & & nx^{n-1} \\<br /> & = & & 2x^{2-1} - 1x^{1-1} - 1(2)^{1-1} \\<br /> & = & & 2x - 1 - 1 \\<br /> & = & & 2x - 2 \\<br /> \end{flalign*}[/tex]

How do I get to the same result of [tex]2x - 1[/tex] ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
[tex] \begin{flalign*}<br /> y & = & & x^2 - x - 2 \\<br /> \frac{dy}{dx} & = & & nx^{n-1}<br /> \end{flalign*}[/tex]
That's not right. (I think) I know what you meant, but you'll do much better if you learn how to express yourself accurately, rather than sloppily.


[tex] \begin{flalign*}<br /> & = & & 2x^{2-1} - 1x^{1-1} - 1(2)^{1-1} \\<br /> \end{flalign*}[/tex]
Why do you think

[tex]\frac{d}{dx} 2 = 1 (2)^{1-1}[/tex]

? I imagine you were trying to use

[tex]\frac{d}{dx} x^n = n x^{n-1}[/tex]

but the left hand sides don't match...

(Understand why this doesn't match. That's actually more important than getting the right answer on this problem!)
 
What is x1-1 ? At one time, 1 - 1 = 0. I hope this is still true. If it is, then
x1-1=x0 = 1.

As for your term on the end, realize intuitively that the rate of change of a constant function is 0 ... (zero).
 
The derivative is simply this:

[tex] <br /> \begin{flalign*}<br /> y & = & & x^2 - x - 2 \\<br /> \frac{dy}{dx} & = & & 2x^1 - 1x^0 - 0 \\<br /> & = & & 2x - 1 \\<br /> \end{flalign*}<br /> [/tex]

The derivative of any constant is 0. This is an important concept.
 
Hurkyl said:
but you'll do much better if you learn how to express yourself accurately, rather than sloppily.

What do you mean by sloppily?


Hurkyl said:
(Understand why this doesn't match. That's actually more important than getting the right answer on this problem!)

Thanks, that's actually what I am trying to understand.

AtaraxiaAle said:
The derivative of any constant is 0. This is an important concept.

Thanks, that's the type of information I was after.
 
username12345 said:
What do you mean by sloppily?
In the problem you're trying to solve, the very first thing you did was to assert that the derivative of [itex]x^2 - x - 2[/itex] with respect to x is equal to [itex]n x^{n-1}[/itex]. I'm pretty sure that's not what you meant to do. Can you state your intentions more accurately?


Thanks, that's actually what I am trying to understand.
The expression

[tex]\frac{d}{dx} x^n[/tex]

has only one free variable: n. It also has a bound variable x that you could rename, if desired. By claiming that this expression matches

[tex]\frac{d}{dx} 2[/tex]

that means you assert that you can choose a value for n (and possibly rename x) that makes the first expression the same as the second one -- not just in value, but in terms of the actual symbols used! (Although, we can gloss over some trivial intermediate steps, if we are confident everyone understands them)

It seems clear that you intended to choose the value "1" for n... but that doesn't work, because that just leaves you with

[tex]\frac{d}{dx} x^1[/tex]

or, if we do a simplification,

[tex]\frac{d}{dx} x[/tex]

which is not the same as

[tex]\frac{d}{dx} 2[/tex]

...
 
make the equation as x^2 - x^1 - 2 x^0
Now dy/dx = 2x - (1 . x^1) - (0 . 2x^-1)
now after multiplying everything you get 2x - 1 - 0= 2x - 1
PS . The dots are multiplication signs as well if you didnt know that
 
Hurkyl said:
In the problem you're trying to solve, the very first thing you did was to assert that the derivative of [itex]x^2 - x - 2[/itex] with respect to x is equal to [itex]n x^{n-1}[/itex]. I'm pretty sure that's not what you meant to do. Can you state your intentions more accurately?

Intention was to find the derivative of [itex]y = x^2 - x - 2[/itex] following the equation in the book and understand how they came at [itex]2x - 1[/itex]. In my original attempt I was trying to use a value of -1 for x in [itex]nx^{n-1}[/itex] which is why I ended up with [itex]y = 2x - 2[/itex]. Now that I know the derivative of is constant is zero, I can understand how they arrived at the answer.
 
Yes, that was your intent. That was not what you wrote.
You wrote:
[tex]y = x^2 - x - 2[/tex]
[tex]\frac{dy}{dx}= nx^{n-1}[/tex]
Surely you can see that is not what you meant nor is it true.
Mathematics is hard enough without expecting people whom you are asking for help to guess what you really mean!:rolleyes:
 
  • #10
Thankyou to everyone who provided help or feedback.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K