Derivative of Determinant of Metric Tensor With Respect to Entries

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the differentiation of the determinant of a metric tensor with respect to its entries. Participants explore the mathematical relationships involving determinants, cofactors, and traces, particularly in the context of tensor calculus.

Discussion Character

  • Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking, Conceptual clarification

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the relationship between the determinant and its cofactor, questioning the nature of the symbols used (absolute vs. relative). There are mentions of using logarithmic properties of determinants and traces in differentiation. Some express confusion regarding the transition between matrices and tensors, as well as the implications of the notation used.

Discussion Status

Several hints have been provided regarding the differentiation process, particularly using logarithmic identities and traces. Participants are actively engaging with the mathematical concepts, seeking clarification on specific steps and definitions, but no consensus has been reached on the overall approach.

Contextual Notes

There is an ongoing discussion about the definitions and properties of the symbols and operations involved, such as the trace of a matrix and the nature of the metric tensor. Some participants express uncertainty about the implications of their notation and the relationships between different mathematical entities.

yucheng
Messages
232
Reaction score
57
Homework Statement
We are to show that $\frac{\partial Z}{\partial Z_{ij}} = Z Z^{ij}$ See https://math.stackexchange.com/questions/4141664/derivative-of-metric-tensor-with-respect-to-entries

P.S. this is actually part of the proof of the Voss-Weyl formula given in Pavel Grinfeld's book but the author does not care to derive it...
Relevant Equations
N/A
We know that the cofactor of determinant ##A##, is
$$\frac{\partial A}{\partial a^{r}_{i}} = A^{i}_{r} = \frac{1}{2 !}\delta^{ijk}_{rst} a^{s}_{j} a^{t}_{k} = \frac{1}{2 !}e^{ijk} e_{rst} a^{s}_{j} a^{t}_{k}$$

By analogy,
$$\frac{\partial Z}{\partial Z_{ij}} = \frac{1}{2 !}e^{ikl} e^{jmn} Z_{km} Z_{ln} = \frac{Z}{2 !} \epsilon^{ikl} \epsilon^{jmn} Z_{km} Z_{ln}$$?

As $$\epsilon^{ijk} = \frac{e^{ijk}}{\sqrt{Z}}$$. However, we should note that Z is **not** a tensor, since we only have relative levi-civita symbols, but if we substitute absolute levi-civita symbols, then it is indeed one (second equality)? Wait, I'm not sure whether one should call the former, ##\epsilon## 'absolute' and the latter, ##e## 'relative'...

Hmmm, this looks interesting. Would you give any hints as to what's wrong? Thanks in advance!
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Use that ln(det(X)) = tr(ln(X)) and differentiate.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: yucheng
Orodruin said:
Use that ln(det(X)) = tr(ln(X)) and differentiate.
I see that you've given this hint somewhere else as well. Reminds me of exponentiating an operator... Oh well, I have got to learn it... Thanks!
 
Did I not format the homework statement properly?... $$\frac{\partial Z}{\partial Z_{ij}} = Z Z^{ij}$$

Where ##Z## is the determinant.
 
It's okay. Orodruin already gave you a hint:\begin{align*}
\dfrac{1}{|Z|} \dfrac{\partial |Z|}{\partial Z_{ij}} &= \dfrac{\partial \log |Z|}{\partial Z_{ij}} = \mathrm{Tr} \left( Z^{-1} \frac{\partial Z}{\partial Z_{ij}} \right)
\end{align*}Do you know how to take the trace?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: yucheng
ergospherical said:
It's okay. Orodruin already gave you a hint:\begin{align*}
\dfrac{1}{|Z|} \dfrac{\partial |Z|}{\partial Z_{ij}} &= \dfrac{\partial \log |Z|}{\partial Z_{ij}} = \mathrm{Tr} \left( Z^{-1} \frac{\partial Z}{\partial Z_{ij}} \right)
\end{align*}Do you know how to take the trace?
I am confused with traces and logs of matrices actually, but let me have a look. (I know the definition, trace is the sum of the diagonal terms, log: expand log in terms of the power series of the matrix)
 
ergospherical said:
It's okay. Orodruin already gave you a hint:\begin{align*}
\dfrac{1}{|Z|} \dfrac{\partial |Z|}{\partial Z_{ij}} &= \dfrac{\partial \log |Z|}{\partial Z_{ij}} = \mathrm{Tr} \left( Z^{-1} \frac{\partial Z}{\partial Z_{ij}} \right)
\end{align*}Do you know how to take the trace?
wait

\begin{align*}
\dfrac{1}{|Z|} \dfrac{\partial |Z|}{\partial Z_{ij}} = \mathrm{Tr} \left( Z^{-1} \frac{\partial Z}{\partial Z_{ij}} \right)
\end{align*}
and isn't

\begin{align*}
\dfrac{1}{|Z|} \dfrac{\partial |Z|}{\partial Z_{ij}} = \left( Z^{-1} \frac{\partial Z}{\partial Z_{ij}} \right)
\end{align*}

?

Because they are scalars!

Wait this is confusing did you intend ##|Z|## to be the determinant while ##Z## to be the metric tensor?
 
No. Remember that the trace of a matrix is ##\mathrm{Tr}(A) = {A^i}_i## with summation implied over repeated indices. Matrix multiplication is ##A = BC \iff {A^i}_j = {B^i}_k {C^k}_j## and the trace of this product is then ##{A^i}_i = {B^i}_k {C^k}_i##.

In the context of this step, \begin{align*}
{\left( Z^{-1} \frac{\partial Z}{\partial Z_{ij}}\right)^k}_l = Z^{km} {\frac{\partial {Z_{ml}}}{\partial Z_{ij}}}
\end{align*}What is the trace?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: yucheng
  • #10
Why am I switching between matrices and tensors o:)
 
  • #11
yucheng said:
Wait this is confusing did you intend ##|Z|## to be the determinant while ##Z## to be the metric tensor?
Yes, I am denoting by ##Z## a matrix.
 
  • #12
Finally, found my pen and paper.

\begin{align*}
\dfrac{1}{|Z|} \dfrac{\partial |Z|}{\partial Z_{ij}} &= \mathrm{Tr} \left( Z^{-1} \frac{\partial Z}{\partial Z_{ij}} \right)
\end{align*}

since $$ Z = [Z_{ij}]$$
, $$ Z^{-1} = [Z^{ij}]$$
, $$\mathrm{Tr} \left(AB\right) = A^{i}_{j} B^{j}_{i}$$

We see that
$$RHS = Z^{lm} \frac{\partial Z_{lm}}{\partial Z_{ij}}$$

and combining LHS and RHS

$$\dfrac{1}{|Z|} \dfrac{\partial |Z|}{\partial Z_{ij}}= Z^{lm} \frac{\partial Z_{lm}}{\partial Z_{ij}} = Z^{lm} \delta^{ij}_{lm} = Z^{ij}$$

In conclusion,

$$\dfrac{1}{|Z|} \dfrac{\partial |Z|}{\partial Z_{ij}}= Z^{ij}$$

or

$$\dfrac{\partial |Z|}{\partial Z_{ij}}= |Z| Z^{ij}$$

Thanks @Orodruin and @ergospherical !
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: ergospherical
  • #14
ergospherical said:
No. Remember that the trace of a matrix is ##\mathrm{Tr}(A) = {A^i}_i## with summation implied over repeated indices. Matrix multiplication is ##A = BC \iff {A^i}_j = {B^i}_k {C^k}_j## and the trace of this product is then ##{A^i}_i = {B^i}_k {C^k}_i##.

In the context of this step, \begin{align*}
{\left( Z^{-1} \frac{\partial Z}{\partial Z_{ij}}\right)^k}_l = Z^{km} {\frac{\partial {Z_{ml}}}{\partial Z_{ij}}}
\end{align*}What is the trace?
Just a quick question, what is $$\frac{\partial {Z}}{\partial Z_{ij}}$$? Do we take the partial derivative of each entry of the metric tensor and get back the matrix with the same dimensions?
 
  • #15
Yeah, it's a matrix with components ##\dfrac{\partial Z_{kl}}{\partial Z_{ij}}## in the ##(k,l)^{\mathrm{th}}## position.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: yucheng

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
5K