Trouble understanding dual tensors

  • Thread starter Thread starter cwbullivant
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Dual Tensors
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the relationship between a pseudovector \( p \) and an antisymmetric second rank tensor \( A \) in three dimensions, as outlined in the equation \( A_{ij} = \epsilon_{ijk} p_k \). The participant references the textbook "Mathematical Methods for Physics and Engineering" by Riley, Hobson, and Bence, specifically equation 26.40, which states \( p_i = \frac{1}{2} \epsilon_{ijk} A_{jk} \). The confusion arises from the manipulation of Kronecker delta identities and their implications in deriving the equality involving the antisymmetric tensor components.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of pseudovectors and antisymmetric tensors
  • Familiarity with Kronecker delta notation and its properties
  • Basic knowledge of tensor algebra in three dimensions
  • Proficiency in mathematical methods for physics, particularly in vector calculus
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of antisymmetric tensors in three-dimensional space
  • Learn about the Levi-Civita symbol and its applications in tensor calculus
  • Explore the derivation and implications of Kronecker delta identities
  • Review examples of pseudovectors and their physical significance in physics
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in physics and engineering, particularly those studying tensor analysis and its applications in mechanics and electromagnetism.

cwbullivant
Messages
60
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Using 26.40, show that a pseudovector p and antisymmetric second rank tensor (in three dimensions) A are related by: $$ {A}_{ij} = {\epsilon}_{ijk}{p}_{k} $$

Homework Equations



26.40: $$ {p}_{i} = \frac{1}{2}{\epsilon}_{ijk}{A}_{jk} $$

The Attempt at a Solution



This isn't a homework question (though it may tread rather close to one). The book I'm working out of is Mathematical Methods for Physics and Engineering by Riley, Hobson, and Bence. I'm having trouble understanding their demonstration of the association of any arbitrary three dimensional second rank antisymmetric tensor with a pseudovector.

The step they use that I'm having trouble with is (the initial contraction and substitution of the kronecker delta identity wasn't a problem):

$$ {\epsilon}_{ijk}{p}_{k} = \frac{1}{2}({\delta}_{il}{\delta}_{jm} - {\delta}_{im}{\delta}_{jl}){A}_{lm} $$

And then:

$$ {\epsilon}_{ijk}{p}_{k} = \frac{1}{2}({A}_{ij}-{A}_{ji}) = {A}_{ij} $$

The very last equality I understand, since Aij are the components of an antisymmetric tensor. I don't get exactly what they did with the delta functions though. In attempting to recreate their work, I get to:

$$ {\epsilon}_{ijk}{p}_{k} = \frac{1}{2}(1-{\delta}_{ij}{\delta}_{ji}){A}_{ij} $$

Which reduces to zero on both sides if i = j, and if i != j:

$$ {\epsilon}_{ijk}{p}_{k} = \frac{1}{2}{A}_{ij} $$

The step they appear to be taking is:

$$ {\delta}_{ij}{\delta}_{ji}{A}_{ij} = {A}_{ji} $$

And I can't seem to work out that equality.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
cwbullivant said:
The step they use that I'm having trouble with is (the initial contraction and substitution of the kronecker delta identity wasn't a problem):

$$ {\epsilon}_{ijk}{p}_{k} = \frac{1}{2}({\delta}_{il}{\delta}_{jm} - {\delta}_{im}{\delta}_{jl}){A}_{lm} $$
Assuming that the right-hand side expression is summed over l and m, the only ##\delta## terms that survive are those where ##i=l, j=m## (first product of ##\delta##'s) and ##i=m, j=l## (second product of ##\delta##'s).
So you get: $$ {\epsilon}_{ijk}{p}_{k} = \frac{1}{2}({\delta}_{ii}{\delta}_{jj}{A}_{ij} - {\delta}_{ii}{\delta}_{jj}{A}_{ji})= \frac{1}{2}({A}_{ij}-{A}_{ji})$$
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

Replies
14
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
6K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
12K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K