Derivative of the Volume of a Cone

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter chompysj
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Cone Derivative Volume
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around finding the derivative of the volume of a cone, specifically in the context of related rates problems in calculus. Participants explore the implications of changing variables (radius and height) and the appropriate differentiation techniques to apply.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant presents the volume formula for a cone, V = (1/3) (pi) (r^2) (h), and seeks guidance on how to differentiate it.
  • Another participant points out the need to clarify which variable is dependent and which is independent, suggesting that a second equation may be necessary if none are constant.
  • A participant indicates that both r and h are changing at a constant rate, implying that pi is the only constant in the equation.
  • There is a suggestion to express the volume as a function of a single variable by relating r and h before differentiating.
  • One participant provides the chain rule for functions of two variables as a method for differentiation, specifically for the volume of the cone.
  • Another participant expresses uncertainty about the differentiation method, suggesting that the product rule might be applicable instead of the chain rule.
  • A later reply emphasizes that the differentiation approach discussed is indeed the chain rule, despite some confusion regarding terminology.
  • One participant acknowledges their limited calculus knowledge and expresses concern over the terminology used, suggesting that it may be a semantic issue.
  • There is a reiteration that the same results were achieved despite differing views on the differentiation method, indicating a potential misunderstanding of the terminology used.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing opinions on whether the product rule or the chain rule is the appropriate method for differentiation in this context. There is no consensus on the terminology or the method to be used, and the discussion remains unresolved regarding the correct approach.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight the complexity of the problem due to the interdependence of the variables (r and h) and the need for clarity on which variable is treated as dependent or independent. There are also references to differing educational backgrounds, which may influence their understanding of calculus concepts.

chompysj
Messages
19
Reaction score
0
Hi, I'm working on a related rates problem, and I need to find the derivative of the volume of a cone.

So the equation is:

V = (1/3) (pi) (r^2) (h)

I'm not sure how to find the derivative. Would the whole thing turn out to be 0? Or do I need to use the product rule?

Please help!

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Your problem statement is incomplete. You have 3 variables - V, r, and h. Which is the dependent variable and which is independent variable and which if any is constant? If none are constant you may need a second equation, depending on the problem statement.
 
I'm supposed to find the rate at which the volume of a cone is changing, when r and h are a certain amount (the r and h are both changing at a constant rate).
So except for pi there are no constants.
 
You have a relationship for r in terms of h or vice versa, so make it a function of one variable and take the derivative with respect to that
 
chompysj said:
I'm supposed to find the rate at which the volume of a cone is changing, when r and h are a certain amount (the r and h are both changing at a constant rate).
So except for pi there are no constants.
Then you need to use the chain rule for functions of 2 variables:
If f(x,y) and x and y are functions of t, then
\frac{df}{dt}= \frac{\partial f}{\partial x}\frac{dx}{dt}+ \frac{\partial f}{\partial y}\frac{dy}{dt}

Here, V= (1/3)\pi r^2 h so
\frac{dV}{dt}= \frac{1}{3}\pi\left( 2rh\frac{dr}{dt}+ r^2\frac{dh}{dt}\right)
 
Thanks for all your help!
 
Hey, chompysj, I think what HallsofIvy said may be right, but I'm not sure...He said chain rule, but showed the product rule. I think it is correct to use the product rule, differentiating it implicitly, as you do in related rates. A rate is what taking the derivative of the cone's volume formula would give you.

When:
attachment.php?attachmentid=21311&stc=1&d=1256346070.png


The derivative (with respect to time, t), I THINK would be:
attachment.php?attachmentid=21313&stc=1&d=1256347257.png


Then simplified to:
attachment.php?attachmentid=21314&stc=1&d=1256347564.png


You will have, now, a related rate for the volume of a cone. This is correct to the best of my knowledge, and I note the fact that I took the derivative of the radius, r, because it, too, is not constant (as you can obviously imagine, as it changes depending on how high or low you go in the cone). Had this been a cylinder, you would not treat r as a variable, but rather as a constant, like (π/3) or 2 per se, because the radius does not change in a cylinder.

I hope this helps, and correct me if I'm wrong!
 

Attachments

  • Picture 2.png
    Picture 2.png
    1.6 KB · Views: 32,727
  • Picture 3.png
    Picture 3.png
    3.1 KB · Views: 33,810
  • Picture 4.png
    Picture 4.png
    2.7 KB · Views: 35,535
No, that is NOT the product rule, it is the "chain rule for functions of two variables" as I said.
 
Oh ok, I'm sorry. You have to understand that I'm only a high schooler in AP Calculus, so my knowledge of Calculus is limited anyway. But I am sure that what I have learned tells me to call that the product rule. What I was taught the product rule was, I used to solve that. So I really think this is a matter of semantics here...

Product rule (that I learned):

f(x)g(x) = f(x)g'(x) + g(x)f'(x)
 
  • #10
Yes, that is the product rule. But if you look closely, you will see that that is NOT what I wrote.
 
  • #11
To find the derivative of the volume of a cone with respect to a particular variable (usually either the radius or the height of the cone), you can use calculus.

Yes, I see, but we came up with the same answers, did we not? Haha! Perhaps I am just misnaming it, or just did it a different way. Anyway, thanks for the response.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
9K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
35K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
9
Views
5K