Derivative of unit step function

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on proving the relationship δ(x-x') = d/dx Θ(x-x'), where δ represents the Dirac delta function and Θ the Heaviside step function. Key insights include the behavior of Θ(x-x') which is 0 for x-x' < 0 and 1 for x-x' > 0. Participants emphasize the need to approach the proof by considering the integral properties of the delta function and the Heaviside function, particularly for the cases when x < x' and x > x'. The discussion concludes that the proof relies on understanding these functions as distributions rather than traditional functions.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Dirac delta function properties
  • Familiarity with Heaviside step function
  • Basic knowledge of distribution theory
  • Experience with integral calculus
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of distributions in mathematical analysis
  • Learn about the applications of the Dirac delta function in physics
  • Explore the relationship between the Heaviside step function and the delta function
  • Investigate advanced integral calculus techniques involving delta functions
USEFUL FOR

Students of calculus, mathematicians, physicists, and anyone interested in the applications of the Dirac delta function and Heaviside step function in theoretical contexts.

shinobi20
Messages
277
Reaction score
20

Homework Statement


Show that δ(x-x') = d/dx Θ(x-x')

Homework Equations


∫ f(x') δ(x-x') dx' = f(x)
Θ(x-x') vanishes if x-x' is negative and 1 if x-x' is positive

The Attempt at a Solution


I saw a relation of the δ function but I don't know why is it like that.

Integral of δ(x-x') from -∞ to x is 1 if x>x' and 0 if x<x'

I'm not sure how to start. Any suggestions?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The statement is really only true for ##x\neq x'##. Try to prove it first for ##x<x'## and then for ##x>x'##.

Neither side has a value at ##x=x'##. But what you can prove that can substitute for that (if one sets up the required structure based on treating them as distributions rather than functions) is that, for ##a<x'<b:\ \int_a^b\delta(x-x')dx=\Theta(b)-\Theta(a)##.

If you can prove those three things, I think that's as close as one can get without getting deep into distribution theory.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
Replies
26
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
2K