Derivatives in 3D and Dirac Delta

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the application of derivatives to the Yukawa potential, specifically the expressions for multiple derivatives such as \partial_i \partial_j ( \frac{e^{-m r}}{r} ) and \partial_i \partial_j \partial_k \partial_\ell ( e^{-mr} ). It is established that the results will include a Dirac delta function, particularly - 4\pi \delta^{i j} \delta^{(3)} (\mathbf{x} ), when applying the divergence theorem. The conversation highlights the importance of correctly interpreting singularities at r=0 and suggests that naive application of the chain and product rules may lead to incomplete answers. The discussion also references Chapter 1.5 of Griffiths Electrodynamics for further context.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Yukawa potential and its mathematical representation
  • Familiarity with Dirac delta functions and their properties
  • Knowledge of the divergence theorem in vector calculus
  • Proficiency in applying chain and product rules in differentiation
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the implications of the divergence theorem in relation to singularities
  • Explore the properties and applications of Dirac delta functions in physics
  • Investigate alternative representations of singular functions, such as 1/\sqrt{r^2+a^2}
  • Learn about the "test function" method for evaluating distributions
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, mathematicians, and researchers involved in theoretical physics, particularly those working with quantum field theory and potential theory.

UVCatastrophe
Messages
37
Reaction score
8
For a research project, I have to take multiple derivatives of a Yukawa potential, e.g.

## \partial_i \partial_j ( \frac{e^{-m r}}{r} ) ##

or another example is

## \partial_i \partial_j \partial_k \partial_\ell ( e^{-mr} ) ##

I know that, at least in the first example above, there will be a Dirac delta function somewhere in the answer,

## \partial_i \partial_j \{ \ldots \} \supset - 4\pi \delta^{i j} \delta^{(3)} (\mathbf{x} ) ##

If you do this by naively applying the chain rule and product rule to the functions, unit vectors, and their derivatives, you will miss it. The way to see that the answer contains a delta function is to apply the divergence theorem, realize there's a contradiction, and then add the 3D Dirac delta ad hoc. (Refer to Chapter 1.5 of Griffiths Electrodynamics for instance.)

This is a subtle point: easy to miss, and worrisome that I have to put some of the answer in by hand. Does anyone know if there are other functions, or combinations of functions and unit vectors, that straight up chain/product rule will give incomplete answers? Or can someone assure me that the delta function is the only case? Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I wouldn't blame the chain and product rules. 1/r diverges at r=0 and r does not have a continuous derivative there, so you have to decide how to interpret this singularity and the derivatives. E.g., you could replace 1/r by something smooth and finite like ##1/\sqrt(r^2+a^2)## and take the limit a to 0 after you did all the derivatives.
 
You can try the "test function" method. If ## \partial_i \partial_j ( \frac{e^{-m r}}{r} ) ## is something involving Dirac deltas and their derivatives, Examine it's action by for example

$$\int d^3x f(\mathbf{r}) \partial_i \partial_j ( \frac{e^{-m r}}{r} ) $$

And then appliMaybe that will be helpful. (Oh I see you need see this about the divergence theorem, nevermind)...
 
I do not have a good working knowledge of physics yet. I tried to piece this together but after researching this, I couldn’t figure out the correct laws of physics to combine to develop a formula to answer this question. Ex. 1 - A moving object impacts a static object at a constant velocity. Ex. 2 - A moving object impacts a static object at the same velocity but is accelerating at the moment of impact. Assuming the mass of the objects is the same and the velocity at the moment of impact...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
13
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
7K