Derive lowest order (linear) approximation

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on deriving the lowest-order linear approximation of the relationship among pressure (PA), volume (VL), and the number of moles (NL) of an ideal gas in a lung, represented by the equation PA((VL)/(NL)^a = K, where a = 1. Participants emphasize the importance of taking the total derivative and suggest using logarithmic properties to simplify the derivation. The final solution simplifies to the equation dPA/aPA = -dVL/VL + dNL/NL, confirming the correct application of the product and quotient rules in differentiation.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of ideal gas laws and relationships
  • Familiarity with total derivatives in calculus
  • Knowledge of logarithmic properties for simplification
  • Proficiency in applying product and quotient rules in differentiation
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the application of total derivatives in thermodynamics
  • Learn about logarithmic differentiation techniques
  • Explore the implications of the ideal gas law in biological systems
  • Review Taylor series expansions for approximating functions
USEFUL FOR

Students in physics or engineering, particularly those studying thermodynamics or fluid mechanics, as well as educators looking to enhance their teaching of calculus in applied sciences.

Jen2114
Messages
23
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


For a single mechanical unit lung, assume that the relationship among pressure, volume, and number of moles of ideal gas in the ling is given by PA((VL)/(NL)a = K, where a = 1 and K is a constant. Derive the lowest-order (linear approximation to the relationship among changes in pressure, changes in volume, and changes in moles of gas within the lung.

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


I know that to solve this you need to take the total derivative. However, I am having trouble arriving at the correct answer because I'm not really sure what to do with the derivative. So my calculations are the ones below:
PA ((VL)/(NL)a = K --> dPA/PA(PA(VL/NL)a ) = dPA/PA(K) --> dPA/PA(VL/NL)a-1 = 1
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Jen2114 said:

Homework Statement


For a single mechanical unit lung, assume that the relationship among pressure, volume, and number of moles of ideal gas in the ling is given by PA((VL)/(NL)a = K, where a = 1 and K is a constant. Derive the lowest-order (linear approximation to the relationship among changes in pressure, changes in volume, and changes in moles of gas within the lung.

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


I know that to solve this you need to take the total derivative. However, I am having trouble arriving at the correct answer because I'm not really sure what to do with the derivative. So my calculations are the ones below:
PA ((VL)/(NL)a = K --> dPA/PA(PA(VL/NL)a ) = dPA/PA(K) --> dPA/PA(VL/NL)a-1 = 1
I think you might find this problem easier if you took the log of both sides of the equation first before taking the derivative.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Jen2114 and scottdave
tnich said:
I think you might find this problem easier if you took the log of both sides of the equation first before taking the derivative.
Thanks, so doing that I got the following:
log(PA(VL/NL))a = log(K) --> a*log(PAVL/NL) = log (K) --> a[log(PA) + log(VL) - log(NL)] = log(K) using log properties for multiplication and division. Is this good so far?
 
Jen2114 said:
Thanks, so doing that I got the following:
log(PA(VL/NL))a = log(K) --> a*log(PAVL/NL) = log (K) --> a[log(PA) + log(VL) - log(NL)] = log(K) using log properties for multiplication and division. Is this good so far?
That depends on what you mean by PA((VL)/(NL)a = K in the problem statement. Is that ##(\frac{P_AV_L}{N_L})^a = K##, ##P_A(\frac{V_L}{N_L})^a = K##, or something else?
 
tnich said:
That depends on what you mean by PA((VL)/(NL)a = K in the problem statement. Is that ##(\frac{P_AV_L}{N_L})^a = K##, ##P_A(\frac{V_L}{N_L})^a = K##, or something else?
It should be the second one where only VL and NL are raised to exponent variable a. So, in that case is
the result a[log(PA) + log(VL) - log(NL) = log (K) correct?
 
Jen2114 said:
It should be the second one where only VL and NL are raised to exponent variable a. So, in that case is
the result a[log(PA) + log(VL) - log(NL) = log (K) correct?
No. Try doing it step-by-step.
 
tnich said:
No. Try doing it step-by-step.
So these are the steps I took
1. Divide both sides by PA --> PA(VL/NL)a = K -->
(VL/NL)a = K/PA
2. Take log of both sides so a in exponent can be brought down --> log ( (VL/NL)a )= log(K/PA) --> a*log(VL/NL) = log((K/PA))
3. Using log properties rewrite VL/NL and K/PA as differences to get -->
log(VL) - log(NL) = 1/a *(log(K) - log(PA) ... not sure what I am doing wrong so far
 
Are you familiar with the product rule and the quotient rule for differentiation?
 
Jen2114 said:
So these are the steps I took
1. Divide both sides by PA --> PA(VL/NL)a = K -->
(VL/NL)a = K/PA
2. Take log of both sides so a in exponent can be brought down --> log ( (VL/NL)a )= log(K/PA) --> a*log(VL/NL) = log((K/PA))
3. Using log properties rewrite VL/NL and K/PA as differences to get -->
log(VL) - log(NL) = 1/a *(log(K) - log(PA) ... not sure what I am doing wrong so far
As you did in the problem statement, you have left out the closing parenthesis in step 3. That notation error has apparently prompted you to misinterpret which terms are multiplied by 1/a.
 
  • #10
tnich said:
As you did in the problem statement, you have left out the closing parenthesis in step 3. That notation error has apparently prompted you to misinterpret which terms are multiplied by 1/a.
Yes, sorry so what I mean is log(K) and log(PA) are both multiplied by 1/a
 
  • #11
Chestermiller said:
Are you familiar with the product rule and the quotient rule for differentiation?
Yes, but I am not sure how it works for a total derivative of an expression.
 
  • #12
Jen2114 said:
Yes, sorry so what I mean is log(K) and log(PA) are both multiplied by 1/a
Right. Now differentiate your equation.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Jen2114
  • #13
tnich said:
Right. Now differentiate your equation.
Ok so then -->1. d/VL(log(VL)) - d/NL(log(NL)) = 1/a*(d/K(log(K))) - 1/a*(d/PA(log(PA)))
2. dVL/VL - dNL/NL = -1/a*dPL/PL and since K is a constant the derivative is 0 so it this correct? Thanks.
 
  • #14
Jen2114 said:
Yes, but I am not sure how it works for a total derivative of an expression.
$$d\left[P\left(\frac{V_L}{N_L}\right)^a\right]=\left(\frac{V_L}{N_L}\right)^adP+aP\left(\frac{V_L}{N_L}\right)^{a-1}d\left(\frac{V_L}{N_L}\right)$$
$$d\left(\frac{V_L}{N_L}\right)=\frac{N_LdV_L-V_LdN_L}{N_L^2}$$
 
  • #15
Chestermiller said:
$$d\left[P\left(\frac{V_L}{N_L}\right)^a\right]=\left(\frac{V_L}{N_L}\right)^adP+aP\left(\frac{V_L}{N_L}\right)^{a-1}d\left(\frac{V_L}{N_L}\right)$$
$$d\left(\frac{V_L}{N_L}\right)=\frac{N_LdV_L-V_LdN_L}{N_L^2}$$
Oh ok this makes sense to me according to the product and quotient rule but the final solution given to us in class should be
dPA/aPA = -dVL/VL + dNL/NL so maybe I just can't see it but I'm not sure if the result you showed me simplifies to this so I know what the solution should be but I'm not sure how to arrive to that final solution.
 
  • #16
Jen2114 said:
Oh ok this makes sense to me according to the product and quotient rule but the final solution given to us in class should be
dPA/aPA = -dVL/VL + dNL/NL so maybe I just can't see it but I'm not sure if the result you showed me simplifies to this so I know what the solution should be but I'm not sure how to arrive to that final solution.
It does reduct to that final solution. Just work on it a little. This is just algebra.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Jen2114
  • #17
Jen2114 said:
Ok so then -->1. d/VL(log(VL)) - d/NL(log(NL)) = 1/a*(d/K(log(K))) - 1/a*(d/PA(log(PA)))
2. dVL/VL - dNL/NL = -1/a*dPL/PL and since K is a constant the derivative is 0 so it this correct? Thanks.
Yes. That looks right.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Jen2114
  • #18
Chestermiller said:
It does reduct to that final solution. Just work on it a little. This is just algebra.
Ok, thanks! will do.
 
  • #19
tnich said:
Yes. That looks right.
Thank you! , this really helped.
 
  • #20
Jen2114 said:
Thank you! , this really helped.
You are welcome. You are not quite done, yet. You still need to state your equation in terms of ΔPA, ΔNL, and ΔVL. I am assuming your teacher has demonstrated something similar and you not required to give a formal proof. Otherwise, you would need to write out a Taylor series and do some more work.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
11K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
7K