Derive optimal anlge for maximum range (Projectile Motion)

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on deriving the optimal angle for maximum range in projectile motion, specifically Equation 2: tan θ = 1 / √(1 + 2gh / u²). The user seeks assistance in applying this equation for both bi-level and uni-level projections, having already derived Equation 1: Rmax = u² / g √(1 + 2gh / u²). A method discussed involves using the standard parametric equations for projectile motion to express y(x) and solve for R implicitly as a function of θ, leading to the determination of tan(θmax).

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of projectile motion equations
  • Familiarity with calculus, specifically derivatives
  • Knowledge of trigonometric functions and their applications
  • Basic physics concepts, including gravitational acceleration (g)
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of projectile motion equations in detail
  • Learn how to apply calculus to optimize functions in physics
  • Explore the implications of bi-level vs. uni-level projectile motion
  • Investigate the use of parametric equations in motion analysis
USEFUL FOR

Students studying physics, particularly those focusing on mechanics and projectile motion, as well as educators seeking to clarify concepts related to optimal angles in projectile trajectories.

MohammadG
Messages
16
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Hey,

For an assignment I need to derive the optimal angle for maximum range (derive Equation 2 below). I know how to derive equation 1 but I need to derive the second equation so I can substitute h = 0, and h = 1, into it, to show the optimal angle for maximum range for bi-level and uni-level.

I have a book that explains it but I don't understand it at all. Any help is really appreciated.

Thank you!

Homework Equations


Equation 1:
Rmax = u^2 / g √(1 + 2gh/u^2)

Equation 2:
tan θ = 1 / √ (1 + 2gh / u^2)

u = initial velocity
g = grav. accel.
h = height

The Attempt at a Solution


One method I have tried is finding the derivative of Rmax, setting it to zero and solving for theta (to find the minimum) which does give me 45 degrees but I cannot apply this to bi-level projection.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The way you've written the fractions is somewhat ambiguous. It's hard to say whether you meant that R_{\text{max}}=\frac{u^2}{g}\frac{1}{\sqrt{1+\frac{2gh}{u^2}}} or R_{\text{max}}=\frac{u^2}{g}\sqrt{1+\frac{2gh}{u^2}} (especially since the term in the radical is dimensionless), but I've realized that it's the second one - the moral of the story is to use parentheses :smile:.

In this case, one method is to use the standard x(t) and y(t) to find y(x) and sub in y(R)=0 to get an equation that defines R implicitly as a function of \theta. Knowing this, you can find \tan(\theta_{\text{max}}) as a function of R_{\text{max}}, which you said you already found.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
4K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
40
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
27K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
40
Views
8K