Derive Particle Speed in Terms of Invariant U.V | Relative 4-velocities Homework

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around deriving an expression for the speed of a particle with a given 4-velocity relative to an observer, utilizing the invariant dot product of their respective 4-velocities. The subject area is special relativity, focusing on concepts of 4-velocities and their invariance.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the relationship between the 4-velocities and question the necessity of introducing a primed frame in the derivation. There are discussions about the validity of the method used to derive the expression for relative speed and the implications of using different reference frames.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided insights affirming the reasonableness of the approach taken, while others express confusion regarding the introduction of primed frames. The conversation is exploring different interpretations of the problem and the underlying assumptions without reaching a consensus.

Contextual Notes

There is a mention of the observer's rest frame being a convenient reference for deriving the expression for relative velocity, and the discussion includes considerations of how to evaluate the invariant dot product in various frames.

scottJH
Messages
6
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


In a particular inertial frame of reference, a particle with 4-velocity V is observed by an
observer moving with 4-velocity U. Derive an expression for the speed of the particle
relative to the observer in terms of the invariant U · V

Homework Equations



##U.V=U'.V'##[/B]

The Attempt at a Solution


[/B]
I used the relation the ##U.V=U'.V'## because U.V is invariant.

Using the rest frame of the observer I obtained

##U'.V' = -\gamma(u_R)c^2##

Then rearranging to find ##u_R## I obtained

##u_R = c*sqrt(1-(c^4/(U.V)^2))##

I'm just wondering if I used the correct method and got the correct result for ##u_R##

Any insight is appreciated
 
Physics news on Phys.org
scottJH said:
I'm just wondering if I used the correct method and got the correct result for ##u_R##

Any insight is appreciated

Yes, your approach and result seem reasonable.
 
As a non-expert in relativity (far from it), I'm confused as to why a primed frame even needs to be introduced in this problem, since U and V are individually frame invariant. So the dot product of U and V can be calculated using the components of these vectors as reckoned with respect to any convenient reference frame. This is what scottH actually did. So why the need for the primes?

Chet
 
The point is that the rest frame of the observer is this convenient frame where you get an expression for the relative velocity in terms of the inner product. Naturally, once the derivation is done and the expression for the relative velocity in terms of the product is known, you can choose to evaluate ##U\cdot V## in any frame.
 
Orodruin said:
The point is that the rest frame of the observer is this convenient frame where you get an expression for the relative velocity in terms of the inner product. Naturally, once the derivation is done and the expression for the relative velocity in terms of the product is known, you can choose to evaluate ##U\cdot V## in any frame.
That's what I thought. So why the need for the primes?

Chet
 
Some people like to denote the same vector in different coordinate systems using primes for some reason ... I guess mostly for when writing in components instead of putting the prime on the indices.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Chestermiller

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K