Deriving a function from within an integral with a known solution

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the challenge of deriving an unknown function \( f(x) \) from within a definite integral, given a known function \( g(x) \) and a known solution \( h \). Participants explore the implications of this problem in the context of integral equations and Hilbert spaces, discussing the uniqueness of solutions and methods for approaching the problem.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses uncertainty about the classification of the problem as intermediate or advanced and seeks clarification on the nature of the integral equation.
  • Another participant argues that deriving \( f(x) \) from a definite integral is not feasible since \( h \) is merely a number, providing a counterexample to illustrate that \( f(x) \) is not unique.
  • A participant proposes a method to find \( f(x) \) by defining a function \( H(x) \) that satisfies certain limits and then reducing the definite integral to an indefinite one, while acknowledging the non-uniqueness of the solution.
  • Several participants note that the problem can be framed within the context of Hilbert spaces, emphasizing that \( f \) is not uniquely defined and that any function \( q \) orthogonal to \( g \) can be added to a solution without changing the outcome.
  • One participant highlights the importance of limits in evaluating functions at infinity, cautioning against treating \( \infty \) and \( -\infty \) as actual numbers.
  • Another participant identifies the problem as an integral equation and suggests that knowledge of linear algebra is beneficial for understanding how to solve such equations.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree that the problem involves non-uniqueness in solutions and can be framed within the context of Hilbert spaces. However, there is no consensus on the feasibility of deriving \( f(x) \) from the definite integral, with some arguing against it and others proposing methods to approach the problem.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include the dependence on the definitions of the functions involved and the unresolved nature of the mathematical steps required to derive \( f(x) \) from the integral. The discussion reflects various assumptions about the properties of the functions and the integral itself.

Phylosopher
Messages
139
Reaction score
26
Hello,I am not sure if these types of problems are Intermediate or advanced. I am not sure too whether they have a certain name or not.

I have a function inside a definite integral. The solution of this definite integral is known. What is the function that satisfy the known solution.

In mathematical terms: ## \int_{-∞}^{∞} f(x) g(x) \, dx = h##

f(x) is the unknown function while g(x) is a known function and h is the known solution of the integral. The actual problem that I have is way harder than demonstrated, but the basic idea is the same. How can I find f(x) that satisfy the solution h.

(If its indefinite integral of course) If h ∝ x. I would have an indefinite integral and then differentiate both sides of the equation and finally have ##f(x)=\frac {1} {g(x)}\frac {dh(x)} {dx} ##. I think this is the right approach if h∝x with indefinite integrals. But its not, its independent of x.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I don't believe it can be done with a definite integral in which case ##h## is just a number. I don't have a general proof, just a counterexample that ##f(x)## is not unique. Suppose it is given that ##g(x)=\frac{1}{1+x^2}## and ##h=\pi/6.##
Then ##f(x) = \frac{1}{x^2+4}## and ##f(x) = \frac{4}{9(x^2+1)^2}## work equally well to give ##\int_{-∞}^{∞} f(x) \frac{1}{1+x^2} \, dx = \pi/6.##
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Phylosopher
kuruman said:
I don't believe it can be done with a definite integral in which case ##h## is just a number. I don't have a general proof, just a counterexample that ##f(x)## is not unique. Suppose it is given that ##g(x)=\frac{1}{1+x^2}## and ##h=\pi/6.##
Then ##f(x) = \frac{1}{x^2+4}## and ##f(x) = \frac{4}{9(x^2+1)^2}## work equally well to give ##\int_{-∞}^{∞} f(x) \frac{1}{1+x^2} \, dx = \pi/6.##

I found a way to find f(x).

I basically took H(∞)-H(-∞)=h and then assumed H(-∞)=0, and so H(∞)=h which means H(x) must be a function with lim→∞ =h while lim→-∞ =0.

One can use any function that satisfies the two conditions and define H(x)=z(x)*h. z(x) satisfies the conditions lim→∞ =h while lim→-∞ =0. After that, we can reduce the definite integral to indefinite one since we know what is H(x) and use the method wrote in the earlier post:

##f(x)=\frac {1} {g(x)}\frac {dh(x)} {dx} ##
##f(x)=\frac {1} {g(x)} h \frac {dz(x)} {dx} ##

But as you said, the solution for f(x) is not unique. Anyway, for my problem I actually don't need a unique solution. In the contrary, I actually want this discrepancy.

Thanks for your reply sir.
 
This is a classic Hilbert space problem. Essentially your problem is: Given (f, g)=h find f. First, observe that f is not uniquely defined. Any q such that (q, g)=0 can be added to any solution and the resulting f will still be a solution.

Now take any orthonormal basis in your function space and express g in that basis: g=\sum_{n=0}^{\infty}g_{n}e_{n}. Assume that a solution exists, then it can be expressed in the same basis as f=\sum_{n=0}^{\infty}f_{n}e_{n}. This means that (f,g)=\sum_{n=0}^{\infty}f_{n}\cdot g_{n}. This transforms your problem into \sum_{n=0}^{\infty}f_{n}\cdot g_{n} = h which obviously is underdetermined.
 
Last edited:
Svein said:
This is a classic Hilbert space problem. Essentially your problem is: Given (f, g)=h find f. First, observe that f is not uniquely defined. Any q such that (q, g)=0 can be added to any solution and the resulting f will still be a solution.

Now take any orthonormal basis in your function space and express g in that basis: g=\sum_{n=0}^{\infty}g_{n}e_{n}. Assume that a solution exists, then it can be expressed in the same basis as g=\sum_{n=0}^{\infty}f_{n}e_{n}. This means that (f,g)=\sum_{n=0}^{\infty}f_{n}\cdot g_{n}. This transforms your problem into \sum_{n=0}^{\infty}f_{n}\cdot g_{n} = h which obviously is underdetermined.
That is some advanced mathematics for me. I will read more on the subject of Hilbert spaces.

Thank you sir.
 
Phylosopher said:
I found a way to find f(x).

I basically took H(∞)-H(-∞)=h and then assumed H(-∞)=0, and so H(∞)=h which means H(x) must be a function with lim→∞ =h while lim→-∞ =0.
Since neither ∞ nor -∞ are considered actual numbers, it's not legitimate to evaluate H at either of these or otherwise do arithmetic with either one. If H is some function of x, you can however take the limit: ##\lim_{x \to \infty}H(x)##.
 
Phylosopher said:
I am not sure if these types of problems are Intermediate or advanced. I am not sure too whether they have a certain name or not.

They are called integral equations. If you have learned linear algebra then you have the background needed to learn how to solve (exactly or approximately) some of them.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
4K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
4K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
3K