Undergrad Deriving Curl of B from Biot-Savart Law & Vector Identity

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The forum discussion centers on deriving the curl of the magnetic field B using the Biot-Savart Law and vector identities. The primary equation discussed is $$\nabla \times B(r)=\frac{\mu _0}{4\pi} \int \nabla \times J(r') \times \frac{(r-r')}{|r-r'|^3}dV'$$. Participants explore the implications of the vector identity $$\nabla \times (A \times B)$$ and the conditions under which certain terms vanish, particularly when evaluating at the singular point where $$r-r'=0$$. The discussion emphasizes the importance of understanding the behavior of the current density J and its interaction with the magnetic field B in the context of Maxwell's equations.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of vector calculus, particularly curl and divergence operations.
  • Familiarity with the Biot-Savart Law and its application in electromagnetism.
  • Knowledge of Maxwell's equations and their physical implications.
  • Experience with handling singularities in mathematical expressions.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the Biot-Savart Law in detail.
  • Learn about the implications of the vector identity $$\nabla \times (A \times B)$$ in electromagnetic theory.
  • Explore the concept of distributions and delta functions in the context of electromagnetic fields.
  • Investigate the conditions under which integrals involving singularities can be evaluated using Gauss's law.
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, electrical engineers, and students of electromagnetism seeking to deepen their understanding of magnetic fields and their mathematical descriptions, particularly in relation to the Biot-Savart Law and Maxwell's equations.

  • #31
about symmetry:

if you first calculate the magnetic vector potential for a spherical surface:

one starts with the magnetic vector potential formula for a point inside or outside a spherical electrically charged rotating surface

$$\textbf{A}=\frac{\mu_o}{4 \pi}\int \frac{\sigma \omega \times \textbf{r}}{\sqrt{R^2+r^2-2Rrcos \theta}} $$

For a figure refer to example 5.11 Griffiths 4th edition. Introduction to electrodynamics:

1611087032189.png


After calculations one obtains that the magnetic vector potential inside and outside is (refer to example 5.11 in Griffiths for this)

Inside spherical surface: $$\frac{\mu_0 R \sigma}{3} \omega \times \textbf{r} $$

Outside spherical surface:
$$\frac{\mu_0 R^4 \sigma}{3 r^3} \omega \times \textbf{r} $$

both are directed along ##\phi## axis.

imagine that we want to find the magnetic vector potential inside a sphere we have cut out a smaller sphere symmetrical with origo in the middle. Where ##r_2## is the radius of the cut out sphere. ##r_1## is the radius placement of the point we want to find the magnetic vector potential. And R is the radius of the outer sphere. ##\sigma=\rho dr##. And denoting R=r' since we are dealing with many spherical surfaces. The magnetic vector potential becomes:

$$\textbf{A}=\frac{\mu_0 }{3} \omega r_1 sin \theta \int_{r_1}r \rho r' dr' + \frac{\mu_0 }{3 r_1^2} \omega sin \theta \int_{r_2}^{r_1} \rho (r')^4 dr' $$

After some calculation we obtain that this is:

$$\textbf{A}=\rho \mu_0 \omega sin\theta \frac{1}{6}[(r_1 R^2 - \frac{3}{5}r_1^3) - \frac{2}{10} \frac{1}{r_1^2} r_2^5]$$

By using that ##\rho= \frac{3Q}{4 \pi R^3}## we obtain that

$$\textbf{B}= \nabla \times \textbf{A}=\frac{\mu_0 \omega Q}{4 \pi R^3}{[R^2-\frac{3r^2}{5}]cos \theta e_r - sin \theta (R^2-6 \frac{r^2}{5})} e_{\theta}$$

By taking curl of this we obtain that

$$ \nabla \times \textbf{B}= \frac{Q \mu_0 \omega sin \theta}{4 \pi R^3} [-\frac{1}{r}( R^2-\frac{36}{10} r_1^2 - 2 \frac{1}{10 r_1^3}r_2^5 + \frac{1}{r}(R^2-\frac{3}{5} r_1^2 - \frac{2}{10} \frac{1}{r_1^3} r_2^5)] e_{\theta}$$

$$ \nabla \times \textbf{B}=\frac{Q \mu_0 \omega sin \theta}{\frac{4}{3}\pi R^3}r_1 e_{\theta}=\mu_0 J e_{\theta}$$The nice thing with this result is that we can set ##r_2=0## so that we are looking at the curl of B inside a rotating sphere. Or we can set ##r_2## approx as large as R so that we look at the curl of B of a rotating spherical surface. Either way the result is ## \nabla \times \textbf{B}=\mu_0 J##

This leads me to my question: The result above illustrates that the curl of B from the spherical surfaces inside ##r_1## cancels due to symmetry. But when it comes to a general calculation of curl of B I don't know in general how to show that curl of B in other points then the point you are calculating curl of B cancels. Anyone know how to do this? For a start look at point 24.

In the end to clear up why I am writing this post. 1: I don't understand the proof for why ## \nabla \cdot \textbf{A}## is 0 in more common proofs therefore I am looking for a different angle.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
555
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
637
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
775
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
662
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K