Deriving Energy and Wave Functions from 3D Schrödinger

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on deriving energy levels and wave functions for a three-dimensional quantum harmonic oscillator (QHO) characterized by quantum numbers nx, ny, nz and frequency ω0. The energy levels are expressed as Enx,ny,nz = (nx + ny + nz + 3/2)ħω0. The normalized wave function for the ground state is given by ψ0(x,y,z) = (mω0/πħ)^(3/4) e^(-mω0/2ħ(x^2 + y^2 + z^2)). The Schrödinger equation for the generic wave function is formulated as (-ħ²/2m)∇²ψ + U(r)ψ = Eψ, where U(r) = (1/2)mω²(x² + y² + z²).

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quantum harmonic oscillators (QHO)
  • Familiarity with Schrödinger equations in three dimensions
  • Knowledge of wave function normalization techniques
  • Basic principles of quantum mechanics and energy quantization
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of energy levels for quantum harmonic oscillators in 3D
  • Learn about wave function normalization in quantum mechanics
  • Explore the application of separation of variables in solving the Schrödinger equation
  • Investigate the implications of quantum numbers on wave functions and energy states
USEFUL FOR

Students and researchers in quantum mechanics, particularly those focusing on quantum harmonic oscillators, wave function analysis, and the Schrödinger equation in three dimensions.

erok81
Messages
454
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



I have a quantum harmonic oscillator with quantum numbers nx,ny,nz ≥ 0 and frequency ω0. There are three parts to the problem. To me it seems they are out of order, but I'm kind of shaky deriving these.

a) Write down the energy level Enx,ny,nz of a QHO in 3d with quantum numbers nx,ny,nz ≥ 0 and frequency ω0?

b) Write down the normalized wave function for the ground state ψ0(x,y,z)?

c) What is the Schrödinger equation for the generic 3d wave function ψnx,ny,nz(x,y,z)?

Homework Equations



n/a

The Attempt at a Solution



To me I think one would solve this c, b, a. I can state a and b first by copying out of the book, but I'd rather derive them since that's the correct method. The only thing I cannot figure out what my wave function is to involve the energy levels.

My guess for the wave equation is...

[tex]\psi (x,y,z) = Ae^{\frac{1}{2}(x^2 +y^2 +z^2)}[/tex]

But I am missing my energy levels n. So I know that is wrong.

My 3d Schrödinger equation equation in this case is...

Well first the potential is given by...

[tex]U(\vec{r}) = \frac{1}{2}m \omega^{2}\vec{r}^2~=~\frac{1}{2}m \omega^{2}(x^2+y^2+z^2)[/tex]

Back to my Schrödinger...

[tex]\frac{- \hbar ^2}{2m} \nabla ^2 \psi (\vec{r}) +U(\vec{r}) \psi (\vec{r}) = E \psi (\vec{r})[/tex]

So. Where I am confused is guessing my wave equation and then solving for the energy.

I thought I would have to do the order like I posted above, but the question is worded differently. Maybe I am more confused then I thought. :)

The steps I would do is write out my Schrödinger, use separation of variables, solve for my wave equation, then find the energy. But I'm not fully sure since I won't have my n values.

Hopefully this makes sense. I've been up for a while and am having some trouble explaining what I've done so far. :smile:
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
So my wave equation isn't correct.

I believe it should be

[tex] \psi (x,y,z) = Ae^{\frac{\alpha}{2}(x^2 +y^2 +z^2)}[/tex]

Where α = mω/ℏ

However the problem states to write down the normalized wave function for the ground state! I don't have any n terms in my wave equation and therefore have no way to relate it to the ground state.

If this were a box, I'd have sin terms and n terms, and I'd be set. However I see no way to incorporate n into this type of wave function.

Any ideas?

On a side note: should I have put this in advanced physics?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
8
Views
1K
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
4K