Deriving Geodesic Deviation - Help Appreciated

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Isa1
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    deviation Geodesic
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the derivation of geodesic deviation as outlined in the provided reference. The user seeks clarification on why the expression x(t) + χ(t) adheres to the geodesic equation (eq. (7)), given that x(t) is defined as a geodesic. It is established that χ(t) can be considered negligible without affecting the geodesic nature of x(t), as the point x(τ) + χ(τ) is stated to lie on a nearby geodesic at the same proper time.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of geodesic equations in differential geometry
  • Familiarity with the concept of geodesic deviation
  • Knowledge of proper time in the context of general relativity
  • Basic proficiency in mathematical notation and calculus
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of geodesic deviation in general relativity
  • Explore the implications of small perturbations on geodesics
  • Learn about the role of proper time in relativistic physics
  • Review differential geometry concepts related to curvature and geodesics
USEFUL FOR

Students and researchers in physics, particularly those focusing on general relativity and differential geometry, will benefit from this discussion.

Isa1
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hi there,

I'm trying to understand the derivation of geodesic deviation given here:

http://wps.aw.com/wps/media/objects/500/512494/supplements/Ch21.pdf

but I can't figure out why x(t)+\chi(t) obeys the geodesic equation (eq.(7)). Of course x(t) does, since it is per definition a geodesic. Could it be that \chi(t) is so small that it is negligible and doesn't change the geodesic character of x(t)?

I'd really appreciate some help. Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Isa1 said:
Hi there,

I'm trying to understand the derivation of geodesic deviation given here:

http://wps.aw.com/wps/media/objects/500/512494/supplements/Ch21.pdf

but I can't figure out why x(t)+\chi(t) obeys the geodesic equation (eq.(7)). Of course x(t) does, since it is per definition a geodesic. Could it be that \chi(t) is so small that it is negligible and doesn't change the geodesic character of x(t)?

I'd really appreciate some help. Thanks!

It is because the point x(\tau)+\chi(\tau) is in the beginning of the paper said to be on a nearby geodesic at the same proper time so no matter if \chi(\tau) is small!

AB
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
2K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
6K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
7K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K