Deriving matrix element from Lagrangian

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on deriving the matrix element for the tree-level Feynman diagrams of the scattering process ##W^{+}W^{-} \to W^{+}W^{-}## using the quartic term ##\mathcal{L}_{WWWW}## in electroweak boson self-interactions. The Lagrangian is expressed as ##\mathcal{L}_{WWWW} = -\frac{1}{2}g^{2}_{2} \left[ (W_{\mu}^{+}W^{-\mu})^{2} - (W_{\mu}^{+}W^{+\mu})(W_{\nu}^{-}W^{-\nu}) \right]##. The matrix element is derived as ##\mathcal{M} = -g_{2}^{2}(2\eta_{\mu\sigma}\eta_{\nu\rho}-\eta_{\mu\nu}\eta_{\rho\sigma}-\eta_{\mu\rho}\eta_{\nu\sigma})\epsilon^{\mu}(p_{1})\epsilon^{\nu}(p_{2})\epsilon^{\rho}(k_{1})\epsilon^{\sigma}(k_{2})##. The factor is obtained by symmetrizing the coefficient in the Lagrangian in indices ##\mu \nu## and ##\rho \sigma##.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of electroweak theory and Feynman diagrams
  • Familiarity with the Lagrangian formalism in quantum field theory
  • Knowledge of tensor notation and metric tensors in physics
  • Proficiency in manipulating complex mathematical expressions
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of Feynman rules from Lagrangians in quantum field theory
  • Learn about the role of gauge symmetries in electroweak interactions
  • Explore the implications of quartic interactions in particle physics
  • Investigate the symmetrization process in tensor calculus
USEFUL FOR

Particle physicists, theoretical physicists, and graduate students focusing on quantum field theory and electroweak interactions will benefit from this discussion.

spaghetti3451
Messages
1,311
Reaction score
31
Consider the following tree-level Feynman diagrams for the ##W^{+}W^{-} \to W^{+}W^{-}## scattering process.

94a15c798a.png


The matrix element for this diagram can be read off from the associated quartic term ##\mathcal{L}_{WWWW}## in the electroweak boson self-interactions, where

##\mathcal{L}_{WWWW} = -\frac{1}{2}g^{2}_{2} \left[ (W_{\mu}^{+}W^{-\mu})^{2} - (W_{\mu}^{+}W^{+\mu})(W_{\nu}^{-}W^{-\nu}) \right]##

##= -\frac{1}{2}g^{2}_{2} \left(\eta_{\mu\nu}\eta_{\rho\sigma}-\eta_{\mu\rho}\eta_{\nu\sigma}\right)W^{+\mu}W^{-\nu}W^{+\rho}W^{-\sigma}.##

Why does this mean that the matrix element is

##\mathcal{M} = -g_{2}^{2}(2\eta_{\mu\sigma}\eta_{\nu\rho}-\eta_{\mu\nu}\eta_{\rho\sigma}-\eta_{\mu\rho}\eta_{\nu\sigma})\epsilon^{\mu}(p_{1})\epsilon^{\nu}(p_{2})\epsilon^{\rho}(k_{1})\epsilon^{\sigma}(k_{2})?##

More specifically, I am not able to derive the factor of ##(2\eta_{\mu\sigma}\eta_{\nu\rho}-\eta_{\mu\nu}\eta_{\rho\sigma}-\eta_{\mu\rho}\eta_{\nu\sigma})## in the matrix element.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You should symmetrize the coefficient in the Lagrangian. Here it's to be symmetrized in ##\mu \nu## and ##\rho \sigma##, i.e., you have
$$\mathcal{L}_{WWWW}=
-\frac{1}{4}g^{2}_{2} \left(\eta_{\mu\nu}\eta_{\rho\sigma}+\eta_{\rho \nu} \eta_{\mu \sigma}-2\eta_{\mu\rho}\eta_{\nu\sigma}\right)W^{+\mu}W^{-\nu}W^{+\rho}W^{-\sigma}.$$
Now the coefficient in front of the fields leads directly to the Feynman rule.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: spaghetti3451

Similar threads

  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
4K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K