Deriving matrix element from Lagrangian

Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
1 reply · 2K views
spaghetti3451
Messages
1,311
Reaction score
31
Consider the following tree-level Feynman diagrams for the ##W^{+}W^{-} \to W^{+}W^{-}## scattering process.

94a15c798a.png


The matrix element for this diagram can be read off from the associated quartic term ##\mathcal{L}_{WWWW}## in the electroweak boson self-interactions, where

##\mathcal{L}_{WWWW} = -\frac{1}{2}g^{2}_{2} \left[ (W_{\mu}^{+}W^{-\mu})^{2} - (W_{\mu}^{+}W^{+\mu})(W_{\nu}^{-}W^{-\nu}) \right]##

##= -\frac{1}{2}g^{2}_{2} \left(\eta_{\mu\nu}\eta_{\rho\sigma}-\eta_{\mu\rho}\eta_{\nu\sigma}\right)W^{+\mu}W^{-\nu}W^{+\rho}W^{-\sigma}.##

Why does this mean that the matrix element is

##\mathcal{M} = -g_{2}^{2}(2\eta_{\mu\sigma}\eta_{\nu\rho}-\eta_{\mu\nu}\eta_{\rho\sigma}-\eta_{\mu\rho}\eta_{\nu\sigma})\epsilon^{\mu}(p_{1})\epsilon^{\nu}(p_{2})\epsilon^{\rho}(k_{1})\epsilon^{\sigma}(k_{2})?##

More specifically, I am not able to derive the factor of ##(2\eta_{\mu\sigma}\eta_{\nu\rho}-\eta_{\mu\nu}\eta_{\rho\sigma}-\eta_{\mu\rho}\eta_{\nu\sigma})## in the matrix element.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You should symmetrize the coefficient in the Lagrangian. Here it's to be symmetrized in ##\mu \nu## and ##\rho \sigma##, i.e., you have
$$\mathcal{L}_{WWWW}=
-\frac{1}{4}g^{2}_{2} \left(\eta_{\mu\nu}\eta_{\rho\sigma}+\eta_{\rho \nu} \eta_{\mu \sigma}-2\eta_{\mu\rho}\eta_{\nu\sigma}\right)W^{+\mu}W^{-\nu}W^{+\rho}W^{-\sigma}.$$
Now the coefficient in front of the fields leads directly to the Feynman rule.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: spaghetti3451