Deriving potential distribution between concentric spherical electrode

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on deriving the potential distribution between two concentric spherical electrodes, defined by the equation V(ρ) = 2V0(ρ0/ρ - 1), where V0 is the potential at the optic axis and ρ0 is the radius at that point. The Laplace equation in spherical coordinates is utilized to find the potential distribution, leading to the equation ∂²V/∂ρ² = (1/ρ²)∂(ρ²∂V/∂ρ) = 0. The solution involves integrating to find V(ρ) = -C/ρ + D, with boundary conditions applied to determine constants. The final derived equation does not match the quoted solution, indicating a need for further exploration of boundary conditions.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Laplace's equation in spherical coordinates
  • Familiarity with boundary conditions in electrostatics
  • Knowledge of potential theory and electric fields
  • Basic calculus for integration and differentiation
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the application of Laplace's equation in electrostatics
  • Learn about boundary value problems in spherical coordinates
  • Research Legendre polynomials and their role in potential theory
  • Explore the concept of electric potential and its boundary conditions
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in physics and electrical engineering, particularly those focusing on electrostatics and potential theory in spherical geometries.

will6459
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



For some work I am doing I wish to be able to define the potential distribution as a function of the radius (ρ) between two concentric electrodes.


Homework Equations



One solution (from reliable literature) defines the varying radial potential as:

V(ρ)=2V0(ρ0/ρ -1)

Where V0 and ρ0 are the potential and radius of the optic axis respectively.


The Attempt at a Solution



Taking the laplace equation in spherical coordinates I find the potential is given by:

\frac{∂^{2}V}{∂ρ^{2}}=\frac{1}{ρ^{2}}\frac{∂}{∂ρ}(ρ^{2} \frac{∂V}{∂ρ})=0

This assumes there is no variance in potential in θ or \varphi which I'm confident is correct providing there is a uniform surface charge distribution across both electrodes. However the steps after this become pretty complex involving Legendre polynomials. I'm certainly no where near deriving the above equation.

Any help or suggestions anyone may have would be very welcome!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hello.
It is possible to solve this equation without using Legendre polynomials. Just remember that:
\displaystyle{\frac{\partial}{\partial \rho }\left(\rho ^2\frac{\partial V}{\partial \rho } \right)=0\Rightarrow \rho ^2\frac{dV}{d\rho }=C}
which is easy to solve. You have to find two constants using two known values of the potential. I am not sure which are these values at your exercise, but I can find a solution which is the same as yours.
 
Thats a great help thank you.

So I rerrange and integrate to give:

\frac{dV}{dρ}=\frac{C}{ρ^{2}}

\int\frac{C}{ρ^{2}}dρ=\frac{-C}{ρ}+D

So:

V(ρ)=\frac{-C}{ρ}+D

I know that at the optic axis (ρ0), V(ρ)=V0 which leaves me with:

V_{0}=\frac{-C}{ρ_{0}}+D

I'm struggling to work out what the other boundary may have been used for the quoted solution in my previous post. If I examine ρ=∞ where V=0, then I get:

0=0+D

Thus V(ρ) is simply:

V(ρ)=\frac{V_{0}ρ_{0}}{ρ}

But this clearly doesn't match my quoted solution:

V(ρ)=2V_{0}(\frac{ρ_{0}}{ρ}-1)

Thanks for the reply Stealth, very helpful!

P.S. I'm unsure as to where the 1/ρ^{2} has gone in your previous post Stealth
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K