Electrostatic Energy in the Hydrogen Atom

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating the electrostatic energy in a hydrogen atom modeled as a charge distribution, where a proton is surrounded by a negative charge density. The specific focus is on determining the electrostatic energy in the electric field of the outer region of a sphere with a radius equal to the Bohr radius.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the implications of modeling the charge distribution and question how to accurately compute the electric field and potential energy. There are discussions about the need for clarification on what is meant by "electrostatic energy" and the challenges of transitioning from a surface to a volume distribution.

Discussion Status

Some participants have suggested methods for calculating the electric field using Gauss's law and have discussed the energy density formula. There is acknowledgment of the complexity introduced by the volume distribution, and while some guidance has been provided, there is no explicit consensus on the approach to take.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the problem statement may lack clarity regarding the specific type of electrostatic energy being requested, leading to varied interpretations of the question.

Keiner Nichts
Messages
13
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


We model the Hydrogen atom as a charge distribution in which the proton (a point charge) is surrounded by negative charge with the volume density of ρ = -ρ0 * exp (-2r/a0) where a0 is the Bohr radius. And ρ0 is a constant chosen such that the entire atomic distribution is neutral. What is the electrostatic energy contained within the electric field of outer region of the sphere of radius a0?

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


I have tried reducing the sphere to a point charge, but it doesn't work for neutral distributions (Should've figured that sooner.) Generally, I've tried to apply everything I could as far as the formula W (energy) = ∫ φ * dq goes (where φ is the electrostatic potential, and dq is the charge.)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think you need to build up the charge density around the proton as a function of radius and as you begin to add layers of negative charge, the electric field and the potential will be reduced in amplitude. Besides the negative electrostatic energy from the negative electric charge distribution, the electric field energy density has a term that i believe is ## U=E^2/(8 \pi) ## in cg.s. units. The question seems to be asking for the electric field energy for ## r>a_o ##, but the question doesn't appear to be entirely clear. The electric field can be computed as a function of r using Gauss's law. The question being asked seems to need some additional clarification. By electrostatic energy, do they mean electric charge distribution interacting with electric field or just the electric field energy?
 
I reckon merely the electric field energy. Though, unfortunately, that is as clear as the question gets...For a superficial distribution I was able to simply assess the potential of interaction between the proton and the electron, and also the potential the electron generates when it interacts with itself, then I used said potential to calculate the energy as the sum between the two respective interaction energies. Though it seems that making it a volume distribution rather than a surface one complicates things further.
 
Keiner Nichts said:
I reckon merely the electric field energy. Though, unfortunately, that is as clear as the question gets...For a superficial distribution I was able to simply assess the potential of interaction between the proton and the electron, and also the potential the electron generates when it interacts with itself, then I used said potential to calculate the energy as the sum between the two respective interaction energies. Though it seems that making it a volume distribution rather than a surface one complicates things further.
Suggestion is to first compute the constant ## \rho_o ## and then compute the electric field as a function of ## r ## (a simple calculation involving Gauss's law.). Finally, compute the electric field energy (as a function of ## r ##) from energy density ## U=E^2/(8 \pi) ##. (Please check this formula but I think I got it correct.) I would compute the electric field energy for both cases ## r<a_o ## and ## r>a_o ## and then even add them for the total electric field energy. It would appear they are not interested in the electrostatic energy of the form ## W=q \phi ##. Note: Gauss law in cgs units reads ## \int E \cdot dA=4 \pi Q ## where ## Q ## is enclosed charge. (The problem can also be worked in mks units where Gauss law has ## Q/\epsilon_o ## on the right side and the energy density expression also has a different constant.)
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Keiner Nichts
Thank you. I think I might've reached a rather satisfactory result using the form in mks units. It seems alright dimensionally, at least.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Charles Link

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K