1. Not finding help here? Sign up for a free 30min tutor trial with Chegg Tutors
    Dismiss Notice
Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Deriving sin(a-b) trig identity using Cross Product of Unit Vectors

  1. Aug 31, 2014 #1
    1. The problem statement, all variables and given/known data
    A and B are two unit vectors in the x-y plane.
    A = <cos(a), sin(a)>
    B = <cos(b), sin(b)>

    I need to derive the trig identity:
    sin(a-b) = sin(a) cos(b) - sin(b) cos (a)

    I'm told to do it using the properties of the cross product A x B

    2. Relevant equations

    A x B = |A||B| sinθ , where θ is the angle between the two vectors

    3. The attempt at a solution

    Well, |A|=|B|=1 *unit vectors
    sinθ = sin(a-b) *for a > b
    A x B = cos(a)sin(b) - cos(b)sin(a)

    Putting this together, I get:
    sin(a-b) = cos(a)sin(b) - cos(b)sin(a)

    I can't figure out what I did wrong?
     
  2. jcsd
  3. Aug 31, 2014 #2
    Try using the determinant definition of the cross product.

    Actually nevermind. I don't thin that'd work. It may though.

    I'm gonna try.

    ## \left( \begin{array}{cc}
    a & b \\
    d & e \end{array} \right)##

    Where a and b are the 1st and 2nd entries of a, and d and e being the same for b.
    ##det(A)= a*e-b*d##

    Which is what you got I think. Hmm.
     
    Last edited: Aug 31, 2014
  4. Aug 31, 2014 #3
    well I did do the determinate, that's how I got:
    A x B = cos(a)sin(b) - cos(b)sin(a)

    But that by itself doesn't tell you the trig identity?
     
  5. Aug 31, 2014 #4
    Hmm. Are you sure it's ##cos(\alpha), sin(\alpha)##and not the other way around?

    Then it'd work.
    Oh in the x y plane. I think that switching them around to (y,x) will give the negative of the first cross product. It would just "point" in the opposite direction. Possibly?
    I'm not quite sure. Trying to help, though.
     
  6. Aug 31, 2014 #5
    yeah, the question has it how I wrote it
     
  7. Aug 31, 2014 #6
    I updated the above reply with a possibility. Since -(cos(a)sin(b)-sin(a)cos(b)) would give the identity
     
  8. Aug 31, 2014 #7
    yeah, you're right. That works if they are switched; it also works to derive the sin(a+b) trig identity if they are switched like that. I'm just thinking now if that is ok to switch the x and y components for both unit vectors..
     
  9. Aug 31, 2014 #8
    Well by the definition of the cross product, it would have the same magnitude as (x,y) just pointing in the opposite direction. So it's just taking the negative of the (x,y) determinant, you don't actually have to switch them. It just shows how I set up the second determinant
     
  10. Aug 31, 2014 #9
    The problem is that you have neglected the vectors in the last expression .

    ##A \times B = [cos(a)sin(b) - cos(b)sin(a)]\hat{k}##

    ##A \times B = -sin(a-b)\hat{k}##

    Equate the above two and you would get the desired result .
     
  11. Aug 31, 2014 #10

    That works too, and is mathematically "valid"

    Thanks for clearing that up.
     
  12. Aug 31, 2014 #11

    FactChecker

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Gold Member

    I think that your "Relevant equation" needs theta to be the angle oriented positive starting at A and ending at B. You have it going the other way when a > b. Change the signs and you've got it.
     
  13. Aug 31, 2014 #12
    So I want to make sure I understand why there should be a negative sign in front of sin(a-b).

    A x B gives me a vector with a magnitude equal to |A||B|sinθ. The direction of the vector, by the right hand rule, is perpendicular to these vectors (into the page). However, the determinate of A x B gives a direction k-hat (out of the page), so I need to make one of the terms negative to be consistent. Is this correct?
     
  14. Aug 31, 2014 #13
    Basically yes, but consistent because of the presence of k hat, no. . We're multiplying the entire expression of A x B by -1. See the post 2 above this one for an explanation by another user.
     
  15. Aug 31, 2014 #14
    How do you know which vector the angle should start from?
     
  16. Aug 31, 2014 #15
    That's why use use the determinant definition, avoiding the angle ##\phi## between A and B
     
  17. Aug 31, 2014 #16
    Actually for sin(a-b) b should be smaller than a so we get a positive angle ##\phi##. Is that what you meant. ?
     
    Last edited: Aug 31, 2014
  18. Aug 31, 2014 #17
    wait, what? If you want the angle between the vectors θ to be positive, you'd want a > b since it is sin(a-b)
     
  19. Aug 31, 2014 #18
    thanks Tanya. but can you explain why there needs to be a negative sign in front of sin(a-b) ? Or was my explanation correct?
     
  20. Aug 31, 2014 #19

    That's what I meant. Basically there's a negative sign so we can flip around the terms. There's not anything ore to it, as far as I know.
     
  21. Aug 31, 2014 #20

    FactChecker

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Gold Member

    In the cross product notation, AxB, the angle is always measured starting from the first vector, A, and ending at the second vector, B. So in your notation, theta = b-a always. That agrees with the right hand rule.
     
    Last edited: Aug 31, 2014
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook

Have something to add?
Draft saved Draft deleted



Similar Discussions: Deriving sin(a-b) trig identity using Cross Product of Unit Vectors
Loading...