Deriving the 4-momentum of a free particle moving in curved spacetime

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on deriving the 4-momentum of a free particle with rest mass ##m## moving along a geodesic in curved spacetime characterized by the metric ##g_{\mu\nu}##. The canonical 4-momentum ##P_\alpha## is derived from the Lagrangian ##L=-m\Big(-g_{\mu\nu}\frac{dx^\mu}{d\lambda}\frac{dx^\nu}{d\lambda}\Big)^{1/2}##, leading to the expression ##P^\alpha=m\ \frac{dx^\alpha}{d\tau}##. The interpretation of the components of ##P^\alpha## as energy and 3-momentum is clarified, emphasizing that such a split requires a specific observer's frame, which is not guaranteed by the coordinates used.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of general relativity concepts, particularly geodesics and metrics.
  • Familiarity with Lagrangian mechanics and the derivation of canonical momenta.
  • Knowledge of tensor notation and the significance of contravariant and covariant components.
  • Basic grasp of the implications of coordinate systems in curved spacetime.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of geodesics in general relativity using the Einstein field equations.
  • Learn about the role of the metric tensor ##g_{\mu\nu}## in defining spacetime geometry.
  • Explore the concept of energy-momentum tensors and their relation to 4-momentum.
  • Investigate the implications of different coordinate systems on physical interpretations in general relativity.
USEFUL FOR

The discussion is beneficial for physicists, particularly those specializing in general relativity, theoretical physicists, and students studying advanced mechanics who seek to understand the relationship between momentum, energy, and spacetime geometry.

jcap
Messages
166
Reaction score
12
Consider a free particle with rest mass ##m## moving along a geodesic in some curved spacetime with metric ##g_{\mu\nu}##:
$$S=-m\int d\tau=-m\int\Big(\frac{d\tau}{d\lambda}\Big)d\lambda=\int L\ d\lambda$$
$$L=-m\frac{d\tau}{d\lambda}=-m\Big(-g_{\mu\nu}\frac{dx^\mu}{d\lambda}\frac{dx^\nu}{d\lambda}\Big)^{1/2}$$
The canonical 4-momentum ##P_\alpha## can be derived from the Lagrangian ##L## using the following calculation:
\begin{eqnarray*}
P_\alpha &=& \frac{\partial L}{\partial(dx^\alpha/d\lambda)} \\
&=& \frac{m}{2}\frac{d\lambda}{d\tau}\Big(g_{\alpha\nu}\frac{dx^\nu}{d\lambda}+g_{\mu\alpha}\frac{dx^\mu}{d\lambda}\Big) \\
&=& m\ g_{\alpha\nu}\frac{dx^\nu}{d\tau} \\
&=& m\ \frac{dx_\alpha}{d\tau}
\end{eqnarray*}
where we have used the fact that the metric ##g_{\mu\nu}## is symmetric.

Thus, expressed in contravariant form, we have derived an expression for the 4-momentum ##P^\alpha## given by
$$P^\alpha=m\ \frac{dx^\alpha}{d\tau}$$
using a completely general metric ##g_{\mu\nu}##.

Is it correct to interpret the components of ##P^\alpha## in the following manner:

##P^0## is the energy of the particle,

##P^i## is the 3-momentum of the particle in the ##\partial_i## direction?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
jcap said:
Consider a free particle with rest mass ##m## moving along a geodesic in some curved spacetime with metric ##g_{\mu\nu}##:
$$S=-m\int d\tau=-m\int\Big(\frac{d\tau}{d\lambda}\Big)d\lambda=\int L\ d\lambda$$
$$L=-m\frac{d\tau}{d\lambda}=-m\Big(-g_{\mu\nu}\frac{dx^\mu}{d\lambda}\frac{dx^\nu}{d\lambda}\Big)^{1/2}$$
The canonical 4-momentum ##P_\alpha## can be derived from the Lagrangian ##L## using the following calculation:
\begin{eqnarray*}
P_\alpha &=& \frac{\partial L}{\partial(dx^\alpha/d\lambda)} \\
&=& \frac{m}{2}\frac{d\lambda}{d\tau}\Big(g_{\alpha\nu}\frac{dx^\nu}{d\lambda}+g_{\mu\alpha}\frac{dx^\mu}{d\lambda}\Big) \\
&=& m\ g_{\alpha\nu}\frac{dx^\nu}{d\tau} \\
&=& m\ \frac{dx_\alpha}{d\tau}
\end{eqnarray*}
where we have used the fact that the metric ##g_{\mu\nu}## is symmetric.

Warning! The quantity ##x_\alpha## does not make any sense in GR. ##x^\alpha## are just coordinates, they are not the components of a vector and you cannot raise and lower the index. You also cannot move the ##g_{\alpha\nu}## inside the derivative at will. It depends on the coordinates and therefore on ##\tau## along the world line.

Is it correct to interpret the components of ##P^\alpha## in the following manner:

##P^0## is the energy of the particle,

##P^i## is the 3-momentum of the particle in the ##\partial_i## direction?

No. The split into momentum and energy requires the frame of some observer. You are not guaranteed that your coordinates define such a frame.
 
Thanks for the reply
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 76 ·
3
Replies
76
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
963
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
22
Views
4K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
4K