Deriving the Bernoulli EquationFluids

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Saladsamurai
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Bernoulli deriving
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion focuses on the derivation of the Bernoulli equation, specifically addressing the conservation of mass within a control volume (CV) of variable area A(s) and length ds. The user seeks clarification on the transition from total derivatives to partial derivatives and the treatment of integrals in the context of a differential control volume. Key assumptions include setting the mass flow rates at the inlet and outlet equal, which leads to the expression for the change in mass flow. The conversation highlights the importance of Reynolds' transport theorem (RTT) in understanding these concepts.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Bernoulli's equation
  • Familiarity with Reynolds' transport theorem (RTT)
  • Knowledge of control volume analysis in fluid dynamics
  • Basic calculus, specifically differentiation and integration
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the Bernoulli equation in fluid dynamics
  • Explore the applications of Reynolds' transport theorem (RTT)
  • Learn about control volume analysis techniques in fluid mechanics
  • Investigate the differences between total and partial derivatives in calculus
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in fluid dynamics, mechanical engineers, and anyone involved in the analysis of fluid flow and conservation laws.

Saladsamurai
Messages
3,009
Reaction score
7
I am trying to follow along with the text's derivation of the Bernoulli equation and I am a little confused with a particular line. The images show an elemental streamtube control volume (CV) of variable area A(s) and length ds.

We assume that though the properties may change with time and position 's' they remain uniform over the cross section 'A.'

So treating as a 1-dimensional inlet/outlet CV we can write conservation of mass as:

\frac{d}{d\,t}(\int_{CV}\rho d\,V) +\dot{m}_{out} - \dot{m}_{in} = 0 \approx \frac{\partial{\rho}}{\partial{t}}d\,V + d\,\dot{m}

Okay. I am missing somethings here:

(1) I am assuming that they set \dot{m}_{in} =\dot{m}

and

\dot{m}_{out} =\dot{m} + d\,\dot{m}

so

\dot{m}_{out} - \dot{m}_{in} =d\,\dot{m}.

Does that sound right?

(2) So the thing that is really bothering me is this. Where did the integral go? AND why did d/d\,t turn into \partial/\partial{t}
I keep getting jammed up on these total derivatives turning into partials. What does it all mean?

thanks :smile:

Picture5-7.png
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I have made another assumption that seems to explain where the integral went:

Since the control volume is of differential size, then upon integration we simply end up with 'dV.'

But I don't really like that. I can't seem to work out the math of it...maybe that's not right at all. I am just grasping at straws here...
 
Any thoughts on this one? Or is Bernoulli like so 1986 or something...
 
It's a bit messy, saladsamurai, I will cough up my old notes and see if I can make a good post explaining this, on Reynolds' transport theorem and such.

There is something strange about how they have set this up, so I need some time to think about it.
 
Okay! I understand the RTT just fine.

The left hand side of

<br /> \frac{d}{d\,t}(\int_{CV}\rho d\,V) +\dot{m}_{out} - \dot{m}_{in} = 0 \approx \frac{\partial{\rho}}{\partial{t}}d\,V + d\,\dot{m}<br />

is the RTT with mass as its 'dummy variable.'

It's whatever 'tricks' (simplifying assumptions) they are using to get the right hand side that are getting me jammed up.

Thanks for looking :smile:
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
919
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
690
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
967