Deriving the Differential Position Vector in Cylindrical Coordinates

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on deriving the differential position vector in cylindrical coordinates, specifically the expression for the differential increment in the position vector. The equation $$\mathrm dr=\hat r \mathrm dr + r \hat \theta \mathrm d \theta + \hat k \mathrm dz$$ is highlighted, emphasizing the need for proper notation with $$d\vec r$$ on the left side. Participants note that the derivation can be approached geometrically or algebraically, and it is essential to differentiate the position vector with respect to time. Clarifications are made regarding the notation used for the radius and position vector, suggesting a more distinct representation to avoid confusion. Understanding the relationship between small changes in cylindrical coordinates and their corresponding vector representation is crucial for accurate derivation.
Istiak
Messages
158
Reaction score
12
Homework Statement
differential position vector
Relevant Equations
vectors, differentiation
I had an equation. $$T=\frac{1}{2}m[\dot{x}^2+(r\dot{\theta})^2]$$ Then, they wrote that $$\mathrm dr=\hat r \mathrm dr + r \hat \theta \mathrm d \theta + \hat k \mathrm dz$$ I was thinking how they had derived it. The equation is looking like, they had differentiate "something". Is it just an equation which came from logic and mind rather than deriving?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Istiakshovon said:
Homework Statement:: differential position vector
Relevant Equations:: vectors, differentiation

I had an equation. $$T=\frac{1}{2}m[\dot{x}^2+(r\dot{\theta})^2]$$ Then, they wrote that $$\mathrm dr=\hat r \mathrm dr + r \hat \theta \mathrm d \theta + \hat k \mathrm dz$$ I was thinking how they had derived it. The equation is looking like, they had differentiate "something". Is it just an equation which came from logic and mind rather than deriving?
This is very similar to the question you asked previously about cylindrical coordinates. You should be able to derive that expression either geometrically (by drawing a diagram) or algebraically (by converting from Cartesian).
 
  • Like
Likes Istiak
PeroK said:
This is very similar to the question you asked previously about cylindrical coordinates. You should be able to derive that expression either geometrically (by drawing a diagram) or algebraically (by converting from Cartesian).
What I could draw that is It :

1630511980943.png

I think it wasn't correct graph. 🤔 (cylindrical was little bit harder that's why I am not taking a look at that.)
 
Ow! I got a figure in book.

Screenshot from 2021-09-01 19-07-53.png
 
Istiakshovon said:
Then, they wrote that $$\mathrm dr=\hat r \mathrm dr + r \hat \theta \mathrm d \theta + \hat k \mathrm dz$$
This is the differential increment in the position vector: How a small change in ##\vec r## relates to small changes in ##r, \theta, z##.

Note that it should be ##d\vec r## on the left hand side.
 
  • Like
Likes Delta2 and Istiak
PeroK said:
This is the differential increment in the position vector: How a small change in ##\vec r## relates to small changes in ##r, \theta, z##.

Note that it should be ##d\vec r## on the left hand side.
got the answer... But, book wrote that; that's dr on the LHS.
 
Istiakshovon said:
got the answer... But, book wrote that; that's dr on the LHS.
The RHS is a vector, so the LHS must be too.
 
  • Like
Likes Delta2
Yes the differential position vector comes from the derivative (with respect to time) of the position vector.
The position vector in cylindrical coordinates is $$\vec{r}=r(t)\hat r(t)+z(t)\hat z$$.

Take the derivative of that with respect to time and have in mind that ##\hat r(t)=\cos\theta(t)\hat x+\sin\theta(t)\hat y##. Also have in mind that ##r'(t)dt=dr,\theta'(t)dt=d\theta,z'(t)dt=dz## and that the unit vector ##\hat \theta(t)=-\sin\theta(t)\hat x+\cos\theta(t)\hat y##.
 
  • Love
Likes Istiak
Ah btw, I found a mini problem both with the OP notation and mine notation at post #8, we use the same letter ##r## to denote the position vector and the radius in cylindrical coordinates, i should 've written $$\vec{r}=\rho(t)\hat \rho(t)+z(t)\hat z$$, and the OP I think should write $$d\vec{r}=d\rho\hat\rho+\rho d\theta\hat\theta+dz\hat z$$
 
Back
Top