Deriving the Differential Position Vector in Cylindrical Coordinates

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on deriving the differential position vector in cylindrical coordinates, specifically the expression $$\mathrm dr=\hat r \mathrm dr + r \hat \theta \mathrm d \theta + \hat k \mathrm dz$$. Participants emphasize that this expression can be derived either geometrically or algebraically by converting from Cartesian coordinates. The correct notation for the differential position vector should be $$d\vec{r}$$, which relates small changes in the cylindrical coordinates $$r, \theta, z$$ to the overall position vector $$\vec{r}$$. The discussion clarifies the importance of using distinct notation to avoid confusion between the position vector and the radius.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of cylindrical coordinates and their representation.
  • Familiarity with vector calculus, particularly differentiation of vectors.
  • Knowledge of Cartesian to cylindrical coordinate conversion.
  • Basic understanding of unit vectors in polar and cylindrical systems.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the position vector in cylindrical coordinates, focusing on $$\vec{r}=r(t)\hat r(t)+z(t)\hat z$$.
  • Learn how to convert between Cartesian and cylindrical coordinates effectively.
  • Explore the geometric interpretation of vectors in cylindrical coordinates.
  • Practice problems involving the differentiation of vectors in cylindrical coordinates.
USEFUL FOR

Students and educators in physics and engineering, particularly those studying mechanics and vector calculus, will benefit from this discussion. It is also valuable for anyone looking to deepen their understanding of cylindrical coordinate systems and their applications in physics.

Istiak
Messages
158
Reaction score
12
Homework Statement
differential position vector
Relevant Equations
vectors, differentiation
I had an equation. $$T=\frac{1}{2}m[\dot{x}^2+(r\dot{\theta})^2]$$ Then, they wrote that $$\mathrm dr=\hat r \mathrm dr + r \hat \theta \mathrm d \theta + \hat k \mathrm dz$$ I was thinking how they had derived it. The equation is looking like, they had differentiate "something". Is it just an equation which came from logic and mind rather than deriving?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Istiakshovon said:
Homework Statement:: differential position vector
Relevant Equations:: vectors, differentiation

I had an equation. $$T=\frac{1}{2}m[\dot{x}^2+(r\dot{\theta})^2]$$ Then, they wrote that $$\mathrm dr=\hat r \mathrm dr + r \hat \theta \mathrm d \theta + \hat k \mathrm dz$$ I was thinking how they had derived it. The equation is looking like, they had differentiate "something". Is it just an equation which came from logic and mind rather than deriving?
This is very similar to the question you asked previously about cylindrical coordinates. You should be able to derive that expression either geometrically (by drawing a diagram) or algebraically (by converting from Cartesian).
 
  • Like
Likes Istiak
PeroK said:
This is very similar to the question you asked previously about cylindrical coordinates. You should be able to derive that expression either geometrically (by drawing a diagram) or algebraically (by converting from Cartesian).
What I could draw that is It :

1630511980943.png

I think it wasn't correct graph. 🤔 (cylindrical was little bit harder that's why I am not taking a look at that.)
 
Ow! I got a figure in book.

Screenshot from 2021-09-01 19-07-53.png
 
Istiakshovon said:
Then, they wrote that $$\mathrm dr=\hat r \mathrm dr + r \hat \theta \mathrm d \theta + \hat k \mathrm dz$$
This is the differential increment in the position vector: How a small change in ##\vec r## relates to small changes in ##r, \theta, z##.

Note that it should be ##d\vec r## on the left hand side.
 
  • Like
Likes Delta2 and Istiak
PeroK said:
This is the differential increment in the position vector: How a small change in ##\vec r## relates to small changes in ##r, \theta, z##.

Note that it should be ##d\vec r## on the left hand side.
got the answer... But, book wrote that; that's dr on the LHS.
 
Istiakshovon said:
got the answer... But, book wrote that; that's dr on the LHS.
The RHS is a vector, so the LHS must be too.
 
  • Like
Likes Delta2
Yes the differential position vector comes from the derivative (with respect to time) of the position vector.
The position vector in cylindrical coordinates is $$\vec{r}=r(t)\hat r(t)+z(t)\hat z$$.

Take the derivative of that with respect to time and have in mind that ##\hat r(t)=\cos\theta(t)\hat x+\sin\theta(t)\hat y##. Also have in mind that ##r'(t)dt=dr,\theta'(t)dt=d\theta,z'(t)dt=dz## and that the unit vector ##\hat \theta(t)=-\sin\theta(t)\hat x+\cos\theta(t)\hat y##.
 
  • Love
Likes Istiak
Ah btw, I found a mini problem both with the OP notation and mine notation at post #8, we use the same letter ##r## to denote the position vector and the radius in cylindrical coordinates, i should 've written $$\vec{r}=\rho(t)\hat \rho(t)+z(t)\hat z$$, and the OP I think should write $$d\vec{r}=d\rho\hat\rho+\rho d\theta\hat\theta+dz\hat z$$
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
812
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K