Deriving the Equation for Projectile Motion: t = 2(vi)/g*sin(theta)

  • Thread starter Thread starter Paradise Jack
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    derivation physics
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on deriving the equation for projectile motion, specifically t = 2(vi)/g*sin(theta), where vi represents initial velocity and g is the acceleration due to gravity. Participants clarify that the sin(theta) term should be in the numerator, not the denominator, for the equation to be dimensionally correct. The context involves a launch simulation, emphasizing the need to understand the vertical component of velocity and the effects of constant acceleration on projectile motion. The conversation highlights the importance of correctly interpreting variables and their placement within the equation.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of basic physics concepts, particularly projectile motion.
  • Familiarity with the gravitational constant (g) and its role in motion equations.
  • Knowledge of initial velocity (vi) and its significance in projectile calculations.
  • Basic skills in implicit differentiation and its application in physics.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of projectile motion equations in physics textbooks.
  • Learn about the role of trigonometric functions in projectile motion analysis.
  • Explore the implications of constant acceleration on vertical motion.
  • Review examples of launch simulations to understand practical applications of these equations.
USEFUL FOR

Students studying physics, educators teaching projectile motion concepts, and anyone involved in simulations of projectile trajectories.

Paradise Jack
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
1. Derive this equation
t = 2(vi)/g*sin(theta)

where vi isinitial velocity, and g is acceleration due to gravity

2. Implicit differentiation, possibly gravity as a constant.

The Attempt at a Solution



t = 2(vi)/v*sin(theta)
dt/d(theta) = 2(vi)/g * dt/d(theta)(sin(theta))
dt/d(theta) = 2(vi)/g * cos(theta)

Basically, I said that velocity and gravity were constants as well as 2. Would this be a correct derivation of the listed formula
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
First, a physical equation is meaningless without a context and a definition of variables within that context. Describe the set-up.
Next, I don't understand the first equation of your attempted solution. What is v here, and where does this equation come from?
 
I think this is the formula for the time for a projectile launched from ground level at an angle θ to reach the ground level again, in which case the sin(θ) term should be in the numerator not the denominator.
 
andrevdh said:
I think this is the formula for the time for a projectile launched from ground level at an angle θ to reach the ground level again, in which case the sin(θ) term should be in the numerator not the denominator.
If both v's are velocities the equation is dimensionally wrong. And g should feature somewhere.
 
I am referring to the equation in 1.
 
andrevdh said:
I am referring to the equation in 1.
Ok. It does help to use the quote feature or otherwise clarify the reference. From the sequence of posts, it was natural to read it as a response to my comment on an equation.
To reply appropriately to your post, there being no parentheses, the sin is in the numerator.
 
Sorry. Will use it in the future.
 
Alright, I'm going to update this for you since apparently there is a lot of confusion. g is that gravitational constant of acceleration. V(i) is the initial velocity, as stated above. The context is a launch simulation, and the problem asks for a derivation. The lack of parentheses does say that the sin(theta) is in the numerator, and it is absolutely correct. Whether it should be there or not in your opinion, it is there in my homework.
 
It seems you are to derive the time a projectile spends in the air (or vacuum, since we generally neglect air resistance for this problem) between launch and touch-down. Here is a hint: The vertical part of the motion is subject to constant acceleration, and there is an equation for the vertical component of velocity in that case. At the top of the trajectory, the vertical component of velocity is zero (why?). This fact will enable you to derive the time it takes for the projectile to reach the highest point of the trajectory. The total time is twice this time (why?).
 
  • #10
Paradise Jack said:
Alright, I'm going to update this for you since apparently there is a lot of confusion. g is that gravitational constant of acceleration. V(i) is the initial velocity, as stated above. The context is a launch simulation, and the problem asks for a derivation. The lack of parentheses does say that the sin(theta) is in the numerator, and it is absolutely correct. Whether it should be there or not in your opinion, it is there in my homework.
Ok, and I assume the 'v' (as opposed to v(i)) in the first equation of your attempted solution is a typo for 'g'.
If so, I wonder if you have misunderstood what you are asked to do. You are asked to show that the given equation is correct (derive it, i.e. obtain it from first principles). Instead, you seem to have taken it as correct and differentiated it.
 
  • #11
What will the y-displacement be when the projectile lands back on the ground?
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
46
Views
5K
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K