Deriving the small-x approximation for an equation of motion

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
4 replies · 3K views
Abhishek11235
Messages
174
Reaction score
39

Homework Statement


The problem is taken from Morin's book on classical mechanics. I found out Lagrangian of motion. Now to solve, we need small angle and small x approximation. The small angle approximation is easy to treat. But how to solve small x approximation i.e how do I apply it?

Homework Equations



Given ##x/l \lt\lt 1## we need to solve:
$$Ml^2\ddot\theta +ml(l\ddot\theta + \ddot x)+mx^2\ddot\theta+2mx\dot\theta\dot x=-(M+m)glsin\theta - mgxcos\theta$$

The Attempt at a Solution


[/B]
I tried to divide whole expression and since ##x\lt\lt
Screenshot_2019-01-28-23-47-10.png
l##,
I ignored these terms. But the answer was wrong. How do I solve it?
 

Attachments

  • Screenshot_2019-01-28-23-47-10.png
    Screenshot_2019-01-28-23-47-10.png
    21.5 KB · Views: 1,608
Last edited by a moderator:
on Phys.org
Abhishek11235 said:

Homework Statement


The problem is taken from Morin's book on classical mechanics. I found out Lagrangian of motion. Now to solve, we need small angle and small x approximation. The small angle approximation is easy to treat. But how to solve small x approximation i.e how do I apply it?

Homework Equations



Given ##x/l \lt\lt 1## we need to solve:
$$Ml^2\ddot\theta +ml(l\ddot\theta + \ddot x)+mx^2\ddot\theta+2mx\dot\theta\dot x=-(M+m)glsin\theta - mgxcos\theta$$

The Attempt at a Solution



I tried to divide whole expression and since ##x\lt\lt View attachment 237939 l##,I ignored these terms. But the answer was wrong. How do I solve it?[/B]
If ##x## and ##\theta## (and their derivatives) are small, you can neglect products of them, so you have ##x^2 \ddot \theta \approx 0## and ##x \dot \theta \dot x \approx 0##. Don't forget that ##\sin \theta \approx \theta## and ##x \cos \theta \approx x.##
 
If ##x<<l## implies ##/dot x<<##?
Ray Vickson said:
If ##x## and ##\theta## (and their derivatives) are small, you can neglect products of them, so you have ##x^2 \ddot \theta \approx 0## and ##x \dot \theta \dot x \approx 0##. Don't forget that ##\sin \theta \approx \theta## and ##x \cos \theta \approx x.##
 
Abhishek11235 said:
If ##x<<l## implies ##/dot x<<##?
No, obviously not. The function ##x(t) = 0.05 \sin(1000 t)## satisfies ##|x| \leq 0.05,## but ##x'(t) = 200 \cos(1000 t)## is not always small, and that is even more true for ##x''(t) = -200,000 \sin(1000 t).## So, no: what I said was "If ##x## and ##\theta## (and their derivatives) are small", then … Somehow you need to get some decent bounds on the derivatives as well, so the problem is not yet solved.