Deriving Wave Function for One-Dimensional Sinusoidal Wave

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the derivation of the wave function for a one-dimensional sinusoidal wave, specifically questioning the source of a highlighted equation. Participants clarify that the equation cannot be derived from an unrelated graph of sin(theta) and suggest reviewing the text where the figure is referenced. It is noted that to achieve a wave function with a period of λ, the sine function must be adjusted to sin(2πx/λ). There is a debate over the correct interpretation of periodicity in the context of the wave function. The conversation emphasizes the importance of accurately referencing figures and understanding the relationship between phase and wavelength in wave functions.
member 731016
Homework Statement
Please see below and https://openstax.org/books/university-physics-volume-1/pages/16-2-mathematics-of-waves for more details.
Relevant Equations
Please see below
Where did they get the equation in circled in red from? It does not seem that it can be derived from the graph below.
1672944351154.png

Many thanks
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Figure 16.10 is just a graph of \sin(theta). It is not referenced in the extract you have posted; why then you would expect the highlighted part to be directly derivable from a figure which is nowhere referred to? Perhaps look at the part of the text where the figure is actually referenced.

I suspect that, prior to the extract you have posted, it is stated that y should have period \lambda. Sine, of course, has a period of 2\pi, so to get a function with period \lambda you have to use \sin (2\pi x/\lambda), so that \theta = 2\pi x/\lambda is equal to 2\pi when x = \lambda.
 
  • Like
Likes Kumail Haider, topsquark, berkeman and 1 other person
pasmith said:
Figure 16.10 is just a graph of \sin(theta). It is not referenced in the extract you have posted; why then you would expect the highlighted part to be directly derivable from a figure which is nowhere referred to? Perhaps look at the part of the text where the figure is actually referenced.

I suspect that, prior to the extract you have posted, it is stated that y should have period \lambda. Sine, of course, has a period of 2\pi, so to get a function with period \lambda you have to use \sin (2\pi x/\lambda), so that \theta = 2\pi x/\lambda is equal to 2\pi when x = \lambda.
Thanks for your reply @pasmith! You meant to say that "it is stated that x should have a period of λ" instead of "
1672949737419.png
" correct?

I guess they took an arbitrary point along the wave to for ratio of phase to wavelength which they also could of picked a point on the wave which has a π phase which has a wavelength λ/2.
1672950703818.png

Many thanks
 
Callumnc1 said:
You meant to say that "it is stated that x should have a period of λ" instead of "
1672949737419-png.png
" correct?
incorrect. In ##y=\sin(2\pi x/\lambda)##, it is the value of y that repeats as x increases by λ, so we say y has period λ.
 
  • Like
Likes berkeman and member 731016
haruspex said:
incorrect. In ##y=\sin(2\pi x/\lambda)##, it is the value of y that repeats as x increases by λ, so we say y has period λ.
Thank you @haruspex !
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top