Design Analysis Needed: Tire Stand Stress Analysis

  • Thread starter Thread starter hail_thy_gt
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Analysis Design
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the stress analysis of a tire stand design featuring an unusual arch supported by four members. Participants explore the structural integrity and design considerations necessary to support a load of 5000 pounds using 80 ksi steel. The conversation includes suggestions for design modifications and methods for conducting stress analysis.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Experimental/applied

Main Points Raised

  • The original poster seeks guidance on conducting a stress analysis for a tire stand design with specific dimensions and load requirements.
  • One participant suggests that the feet of the stand should be tied together to prevent spreading and recommends increasing the contact surface area to distribute the load more effectively.
  • The same participant questions the economic viability of the arched design and proposes using more conventional materials to minimize fabrication time.
  • The original poster expresses a commitment to maintaining the arch design for aesthetic reasons, as the stand will be displayed in a showroom.
  • Another participant mentions that stress analysis can be performed using Finite Element Analysis (FEA) software and recommends specific tools, including Freecad for CAD drawing and LISA for FEA.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants present differing views on the design approach, particularly regarding the arched structure versus more conventional designs. There is no consensus on the optimal design or analysis method, and the discussion remains unresolved.

Contextual Notes

The discussion lacks specific details on the assumptions required for the stress analysis, such as load distribution and material properties beyond the stated steel grade. The effectiveness of the proposed design modifications remains unverified.

hail_thy_gt
Messages
17
Reaction score
0
Hello all,

New here. Hopefully I'm following the guidelines by posting here.

So, I am in need of some help in analyzing a stand that I am designing. It has an unusual arch in the middle supported by four members; together they make a tire stand. My tire is 40inches in width. And the stand will be holding 5000 pounds, so I'm using 80 ksi steel as a result.

I am unsure as to where to begin my stress analysis, so that I know the thickness and appropriate dimensions I need to use.

I am attaching the image of my design.

I appreciate in advance to folks that are willing to help.
 

Attachments

  • IMG_20130620_182519.jpg
    IMG_20130620_182519.jpg
    50.3 KB · Views: 493
Engineering news on Phys.org
One thing that immediately draws my attention is the feet should be tied together to resist spreading. It also wouldn't hurt to increase the contact surface area of the feet to better distribute the load. The arched design is very good, but, not economical. I envision a pipe half or rolled plate with angle iron or square tubing. Making maximum use of stock material shapes minimizes fabrication time.
 
Hey Chronos,

Appreciate the reply.

I think I will be taking those suggestions and updating the design, but in regards to the arch, I have to stick with that idea. This stand will be in a showroom, and it has to have some sort of an appeal, or else a jack design would have suffice.

I would appreciate if you can further shed light on how to analyze the stress distribution, so I can adjust the dimensions.

Thanks in advance.
 
I've only done this using FEA software. The first thing you will need is a CAD drawing. Here is a link to Freecad, which is pretty good [and free]: http://www.freecadweb.org/. Next, you need a FEA program. LISA is pretty good, free, and accepts Freecad imports: http://lisafea.com/.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K