Designing RF Antennas: From Intuition to Simulation Tools

  • Thread starter Thread starter TheAnalogKid83
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Antennas Design Rf
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the design of RF antennas, particularly focusing on the geometrical aspects and the methodologies used in their creation. Participants explore the origins of antenna geometries, the role of intuition versus simulation tools in the design process, and specific interests in quad band cellular antennas.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions the mathematical derivation of antenna geometries, noting their seemingly random nature and dependence on material properties.
  • Another suggests that broadband antennas often utilize fractal designs, indicating that design typically involves selecting fractal parameters, simulating, and iterating based on testing.
  • A third participant mentions that the design of a quad band cellular antenna is influenced by the need to be sensitive to specific frequency bands, and discusses the potential for duplexing antennas for different frequency ranges.
  • A participant introduces a specific design tool, EZNEC, highlighting its features and limitations, and notes that while computer-generated dimensions are helpful, adjustments are often necessary during the building process.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express various viewpoints on the design process, with some emphasizing intuition and iterative design while others highlight the importance of simulation tools. There is no consensus on the best approach or the mathematical foundations of antenna geometries.

Contextual Notes

The discussion includes references to specific design tools and methodologies, but lacks detailed mathematical frameworks or definitions that could clarify the assumptions underlying the proposed designs.

Who May Find This Useful

Individuals interested in RF antenna design, particularly those exploring the balance between theoretical principles and practical applications in cellular technology.

TheAnalogKid83
Messages
174
Reaction score
0
I have a lot of general questions on the design of RF antennas.

Where do the geometries come from? I've been looking at embedded PCB antennas and also modules that attach to PCBs and they always have exotic looking notches and curves. Some are 3D while others are flat 2D styles. How does one actually arrive at such geometries mathematically? They seem so random and I know that their are exact subtleties to why the specific combination of geometries are in place, and even then, these geometries depend on the materials being used.

In the cellular industry, is it mostly intuitive knowledge combined with an iterative design approach that these designers come to their final antenna design, or do they use special design tools/simulations or mathematics/physics theory to get there? I know its probably a combination, but I'm wondering what it takes to actually design an antenna.

I'm particularly interested in the design of cellular quad band passive antennas, so if anyone has any experience or suggestions on where to start, I would appreciate it greatly.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
For broadband applications they are usualy fractals. There are ltos of ways to generate fractals.
I think most applications are designed by picking some fractal parameters and then making a real or computer simulated antenna, testing it and then adjusting the paramters.
I don't know you can calculate what fractal is best from first principles.
 
The principles describing the behavior of electromagnetic waves are the Maxwell's equations; that's where we start. More complicated solutions can be approximated by sophisticated software simulations.

A quad band cellular antenna for instance is designed to be sensitive to bands of interest, like 1.8 and 1.9 GHz, and some bands in 800 MHz range. The design could have two antennas duplexed together where one is sensitive to the higher frequencies, and one to lower frequencies. There is no need to pick up anything in between.
 
Last edited:
There are some very nice design programs for antennas.

One that offers a fully working free demo version is EZNEC
http://www.eznec.com/demoinfo.htm

You enter dimensions for wires in a coordinate form that let's you set the spacing between wires as well. Wires can be any diameter so they can be pipes or solid rods or actually thin wires.
A wire is regarded as a number of smaller chunks called segments and you specify how many of these there are in a wire. You get greater accuracy of predicted effects if you have more segments.

This demo limits you to 20 segments but the commercial version allows hundreds of segments.
This is ample for simple antennas.
Sample antenna designs are included.

Other programs ask for a frequency and then just present you with the dimensions for building the antenna.
Building the antenna nearly always involves a bit of adjustment of the computer generated dimensions, but they are a good guide as a start.
 

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
10K
Replies
3
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
37K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K