Detecting Electric Fields with Motion: Is the Field Moving?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter log0
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Fields Motion
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the detection of electric fields generated by a moving charged particle and the implications of sensor timing in relation to the particle's motion. Participants explore the nature of electric fields, the concept of retarded potentials, and the effects of relativistic speeds on field measurements.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant suggests that sensors aligned with the path of a moving charged particle will be triggered simultaneously, questioning the implications for the electric field's behavior.
  • Another participant counters that the sensors will be triggered sequentially due to the finite velocity of the particle.
  • A different perspective introduces the idea of analyzing the problem from a frame where the particle is at rest, suggesting that the sensors' motion could provide insights.
  • One participant discusses the mathematical representation of the electric field in terms of length contraction, proposing that the field is not lagging but rather contracted in the direction of motion.
  • Another participant elaborates on the concept of retarded potentials, indicating that each sensor perceives the field from different points in time, leading to simultaneous triggering despite the particle's motion.
  • Concerns are raised about the relevance of length contraction, noting that such effects are significant only at speeds close to that of light.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on whether the sensors will be triggered simultaneously or sequentially, indicating a lack of consensus on the timing of sensor activation in relation to the moving charge.

Contextual Notes

Some assumptions regarding the speed of the charged particle and the conditions under which relativistic effects become significant are not fully explored, leaving room for further clarification.

log0
Messages
35
Reaction score
0
Let's say I've got a charged particle moving with constant velocity and multiple columns of electric field sensors parallel to its path. The sensors will trigger whenever a maximum passes by.

Will the sensors in a row be triggered at the same time? If they are, what does it mean for the field? Is it moving with the charge? If it does, what is it that is moving?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The sensors will be triggered sequentially, not simultaneously.
 
It is an interesting exercise to consider this problem using a frame in which the particle is at rest and the sensors are moving as well.
 
jtbell said:
It may help to look at Figure 26.4 on this page from the Feynman lectures:

http://www.feynmanlectures.caltech.edu/II_26.html
Thank a lot for the link.

I am looking at the case of the charge passing a row of sensors (y-axis):
z = 0
x - vt = 0

This means:
Ez = 0
Ex = 0
Ey = k / (sqrt(1-v^2) *y^2)

So the field not lagging behind, it is simply length contracted in the direction of motion.

Why would the sensors be triggered sequentially as stated by David? Am I missing something?
 
Can you explain your rationale why you think they will be triggered all at exactly the same time? I mean, the particle is moving with a finite velocity, right?
 
rumborak said:
Can you explain your rationale why you think they will be triggered all at exactly the same time? I mean, the particle is moving with a finite velocity, right?
I am looking at the field lines or better equipotential lines of a charge. For a charge at rest they are circles. For a charge in motion they are ellipses aligned with the direction of motion (length contraction). The maximum will be measured when the sensors are closest to the circle or aligned ellipse. This happens at the moment when the charge is at the same height as the sensor row.

Now, I've been reading up on the retarded potential concept. My current understanding is that the length contracted field (aligned elliptic equipotential) is a composite image of what is going on. The more correct view is that each sensor sees the field at a different point in the past, depending on its distance at that time. Also the equipotential as seen by the sensor is a rotated (or skewed?) ellipse, with the rotation angle being half the angle towards the sensor.

So the sensors are triggered at the same time, but they are triggered by the retarded field from different points in time.
 
Are you aware that these length contractions only become relevant at close to the speed of light?
 
rumborak said:
Are you aware that these length contractions only become relevant at close to the speed of light?
Since a charged particle can exert a large electric force, moving electric fields are sensitive to relativistic effects. For example, the typical speed of electrons in household wiring is probably around 1013 times less than the speed of light. That would make Lorentz length contraction on the order of 10-26. Yet the magnetic field surrounding the wire is easily measurable.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 73 ·
3
Replies
73
Views
6K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
3K
Replies
9
Views
2K