Hi,(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

After obtaining the 2D rotation matrix (as a function of rotation angle) once by geometry and once by complex algebra, I tried to obtain it by invariance of the Euclidean metric. By this approach, the four elements of the 2D rotation matrix can be determined in terms of a single adjustable parameter, which is all right as rotation in 2D is characterised by a single parameter.

However when I try this with the 3D rotation matrices, I get 3 adjustable parameters. But 3D rotation is characterised by only 2 independent parameters! What's happening?

Further, I can show that the 2D rotation matrices must have determinant equal to 1/-1. Is the same true for 3 or higher dimensions?

Thanks.

Molu

**Physics Forums | Science Articles, Homework Help, Discussion**

Dismiss Notice

Join Physics Forums Today!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Homework Help: Determinant of rotation matrices

**Physics Forums | Science Articles, Homework Help, Discussion**