Determinant of the electromagnetic matrix

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on the relationship between the electromagnetic tensor and its determinant, specifically examining the invariant expression involving the electromagnetic fields E and B. It highlights the equation FαβFμη εαβμη = 8 E*B and notes that the determinant is derived as (E*B)² divided by 8. The author explores the implications of raising the invariant to the power of two and compares it to the determinant definition for a 4x4 matrix, raising questions about index placement and potential errors. The conversation also touches on the properties of skew-symmetric tensors and the need to demonstrate the equivalence of the determinant and the Pfaffian of the tensor. The discussion concludes with a clarification on a typo regarding the factorial terms involved in the calculations.
zn5252
Messages
71
Reaction score
0
hi there,
In this wikipedia article https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electromagnetic_tensor
we have the following invariant :

FαβFμη εαβμη = 8 E*B

However the determinant is the square of this quantity divided by 8, i.e. ( E*B )2 .

Now from the definition of the determinant for a 4x4 matrix , we have :

MiaMjbMkcMid εijkl = εabcd det(M) [D]

Now If I raise the expression 1/8 FαβFμη εαβμη to the power of 2, I would get :

1/8 FαβFμη εαβμη 1/8 FθλFσω εθλσω [E]

Now If I compare this expression with equation D above, I see that some indices do not fall into the right place and also in Equation D, we have the expression for the determinant , however in expression E, we see that we have the matrix F multiplied 4 times much like in expression D (or is it rows or columns that get multiplied).

We should also bear in mind that the magnetic field is the spatial part of F and thhat the electric field is the time part :

Fi0 = E and Fijεijk = Bk

How can we reconcile expression E with D then ? or is this an error perhaps ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
As always, I end up trying to answer my own question :) . So that others benefit .

We have for a skew symmetric tensor :

det(F) = Pf(F)2 , we would need to show that 1/8 εαβγδFαβFγδ = Pf(F)

Now since F is skew symmetric, we would find 2!2!2! = 8 terms which have similar (and counting the levi civita tensor evenness and oddness) indices. There are 3 such terms, namely

8 FαβFγδ - 8 FαγFβδ + 8 FαδFβγ where for Levi civita, the 0123 combination is taken as +1
and so one would obtain the Pf(F). No need to prove that D and E are equivalent.
Hope I got it right.
 
Typo : that should have been (2!*2!)*2 and not 2!*2!*2! - sorry
 
In an inertial frame of reference (IFR), there are two fixed points, A and B, which share an entangled state $$ \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}(|0>_A|1>_B+|1>_A|0>_B) $$ At point A, a measurement is made. The state then collapses to $$ |a>_A|b>_B, \{a,b\}=\{0,1\} $$ We assume that A has the state ##|a>_A## and B has ##|b>_B## simultaneously, i.e., when their synchronized clocks both read time T However, in other inertial frames, due to the relativity of simultaneity, the moment when B has ##|b>_B##...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
1K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
1K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
892
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
629