Determinant Question: Show det(M) = det(A) det(D)

  • Thread starter Thread starter ehrenfest
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Determinant
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on proving that for matrices A, B, and D, the determinant of the block matrix M, defined as having A in the upper left, B in the upper right, D in the lower right, and 0 in the lower left, satisfies the equation det(M) = det(A) det(D). Participants suggest using cofactor expansion and induction on the size of matrix A to establish this relationship. Additionally, they explore the implications of matrix diagonalization and block matrix multiplication in the proof process.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of determinants in linear algebra
  • Familiarity with block matrices and their properties
  • Knowledge of cofactor expansion and induction methods
  • Basic concepts of matrix diagonalization
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of block matrices in linear algebra
  • Learn about cofactor expansion techniques for calculating determinants
  • Research induction proofs in the context of linear algebra
  • Explore matrix diagonalization and its applications in determinant calculations
USEFUL FOR

Students and educators in linear algebra, mathematicians interested in matrix theory, and anyone looking to deepen their understanding of determinants and block matrix operations.

ehrenfest
Messages
2,001
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement



A is a k by k matrix, B is a k by l matrix, D is an l by l matrix.

Let M be the (k+l) by (k+l) matrix that has A in the upper left, B in the upper right, D in the lower right, and 0 in the lower left.

Show that det(M) = det(A) det(D)

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution

 
Physics news on Phys.org
your attempt?
 
I would have posted my attempt if it had gone anywhere. But anyway, I tried to use the fact the determinant is an alternating multilinear map. I tried to use cofactor expansion and that seemed like it might work but could get really messy and I thought that there is probably a better way to do it. On second thought though, cofactor expansion might be the best approach...
 
Cofactor expansion on the first row is a good idea. Try induction on k.

I've seen a combinatorial proof of this, but unfortunately have long forgotten it.
 
Wait. Do you mean the first column? The first row doesn't (necessarily) have any 0s in it?
 
Last edited:
i think tou can diagonalize the bigger M matrix with an SO(k+l) rotation, the determinant should be invariant under this operation.
Now u get a block reduced matrix and you equation hold.
 
Never mind. Induction worked well. Now I want to show that if our matrix is

(A B)
(C D)

where A is k by k, B is k by l, C is l by k, D is l by l

Then its determinant is detA det(C A^(-1) B)

I have seen this before and it involves factoring the matrix into 2 triangular matrices. I forget exactly how it goes. Does anyone remember why you can do this:

(A B) = ( E 0)(A B )
(C D) ( C A^(-1) E)( 0 D - C A^(-1) B )

if that makes sense. E is the identity matrix.
 
Last edited:
Never mind. I just realized you can multiply "block" matrices block by block.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
7K
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K