Hi all,(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

I've been looking around at formulae for determinants (using them for tensor densities) and I just want to clarify that the expression below is correct (i.e. formulae are correct):

[tex] |M| = \sum^n_{a_1,a_2, \ldots ,a_n = 1} \epsilon_{a_1a_2 \ldots a_n} M_{1a_1}M_{2a_2} \ldots M_{na_n} = \sum^n_{a_1,a_2, \ldots ,a_n = 1} \epsilon_{a_1a_2 \ldots a_n} M_{a_11}M_{a_22} \ldots M_{a_nn}[/tex]

The reason I ask is that the second formulae lends itself to Einstein notation:

[tex] |M| = \epsilon_{a_1a_2 \ldots a_n} M^{a_1}{}_1M^{a_2}{}_2 \ldots M^{a_n}{}_n[/tex]

As an aside question, is this correct in the sense that there are unmatched indices on each side of the equation? I have found the following formula which seems to correct this:

[tex] \epsilon_{b_1b_2 \ldots b_n}|M| = \epsilon_{a_1a_2 \ldots a_n} M^{a_1}{}_{b_1}M^{a_2}{}_{b_2} \ldots M^{a_n}{}_{b_n}[/tex]

I think they are both correct...?

Cheers

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Determinat formula in Einstein notation

Loading...

Similar Threads - Determinat formula Einstein | Date |
---|---|

I Geometric intuition of a rank formula | Feb 8, 2018 |

A Valence formula- fundamental domain- why truncation height? | May 7, 2017 |

X0 value for Newton's forward interpolation formula | Oct 27, 2015 |

Determinats,dependence, span, basis. | May 8, 2012 |

Determinat of a continous matrix? | Apr 17, 2005 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**