Determinat formula in Einstein notation

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the correctness of determinant formulas in Einstein notation, specifically the expression |M| = ∑^n_{a_1,a_2, \ldots ,a_n = 1} ε_{a_1a_2 \ldots a_n} M_{1a_1}M_{2a_2} ... M_{na_n} and its equivalence to |M| = ε_{a_1a_2 \ldots a_n} M^{a_1}{}_1M^{a_2}{}_2 ... M^{a_n}{}_n. Participants confirm that both formulations are valid, with the latter being more suitable for Einstein notation. The final formula presented is |M| = (1/n!) ε^{b_1 \ldots b_n} ε_{a_1 \ldots a_n} M^{a_1}{}_{b_1} ... M^{a_n}{}_{b_n}, which resolves unmatched indices.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Einstein summation convention
  • Familiarity with determinants and tensor densities
  • Knowledge of the Levi-Civita symbol and its properties
  • Basic linear algebra concepts related to matrices
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of the Levi-Civita symbol in depth
  • Learn about tensor calculus and its applications in physics
  • Explore advanced topics in linear algebra, focusing on determinants
  • Investigate the implications of Einstein notation in theoretical physics
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, physicists, and students studying tensor analysis or advanced linear algebra, particularly those interested in the application of determinants in Einstein notation.

ianhoolihan
Messages
144
Reaction score
0
Hi all,

I've been looking around at formulae for determinants (using them for tensor densities) and I just want to clarify that the expression below is correct (i.e. formulae are correct):
|M| = \sum^n_{a_1,a_2, \ldots ,a_n = 1} \epsilon_{a_1a_2 \ldots a_n} M_{1a_1}M_{2a_2} \ldots M_{na_n} = \sum^n_{a_1,a_2, \ldots ,a_n = 1} \epsilon_{a_1a_2 \ldots a_n} M_{a_11}M_{a_22} \ldots M_{a_nn}
The reason I ask is that the second formulae lends itself to Einstein notation:
|M| = \epsilon_{a_1a_2 \ldots a_n} M^{a_1}{}_1M^{a_2}{}_2 \ldots M^{a_n}{}_n

As an aside question, is this correct in the sense that there are unmatched indices on each side of the equation? I have found the following formula which seems to correct this:
\epsilon_{b_1b_2 \ldots b_n}|M| = \epsilon_{a_1a_2 \ldots a_n} M^{a_1}{}_{b_1}M^{a_2}{}_{b_2} \ldots M^{a_n}{}_{b_n}
I think they are both correct...?

Cheers
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Try

|M| = \frac{1}{n!} \varepsilon^{b_1 \ldots b_n} \varepsilon_{a_1 \ldots a_n} M^{a_1}{}_{b_1} \ldots M^{a_n}{}_{b_n}
 
Ben Niehoff said:
Try

|M| = \frac{1}{n!} \varepsilon^{b_1 \ldots b_n} \varepsilon_{a_1 \ldots a_n} M^{a_1}{}_{b_1} \ldots M^{a_n}{}_{b_n}

OK, that's good. Putting \epsilon_{b_1 \ldots b_n} on both sides gives my final formula.

Also, according to http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Levi-Civita_symbol#Determinants does this not imply that my second formula is equivalent to yours?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 67 ·
3
Replies
67
Views
16K