Determine impulse response given input and output signals

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around determining the unknown impulse response g1(t) from given input and output signals, focusing on the methods of convolution and the potential confusion between impulse response and step response terminology.

Discussion Character

  • Homework-related, Conceptual clarification, Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses difficulty in applying the convolution shortcut for rectangular signals to the problem at hand and questions if there are alternative methods available.
  • Another participant raises a question about the terminology used in the problem, specifically whether impulse response is being equated to step response.
  • A subsequent reply suggests that the terminology might be a typo, indicating that the figure labels may have caused confusion.
  • A later post indicates a continued interest in the topic, suggesting that the discussion may not have reached a resolution.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants have not reached a consensus on the terminology issue regarding impulse response and step response, and the main problem of determining the impulse response remains unresolved.

Contextual Notes

There is uncertainty regarding the application of convolution methods when the output signal is provided instead of the impulse response. Additionally, the potential typo in the problem statement regarding terminology may affect participants' understanding.

jsg94
Messages
8
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Hello everyone,

In the following problem I have to find the unknown impulse response g1(t) given the input and output signals, as shown below:
(the answer is already there, at the moment I am trying to understand how to get there).
fullsizeoutput_1462.jpeg


Homework Equations


[/B]
I have attempted to use the following convolution shortcut for two rectangular signals, but can't really figure out how they obtained the answer from above.
Screen Shot 2018-02-04 at 9.33.04 PM.png


The Attempt at a Solution



I understand how they did the convolution shortcut above, but I am having a hard time trying to apply it to the given problem. I do not know if there is a different method I would be able to use. I find it a little difficult to do the regular convolution method if you are given the output signal, and not the signal you're convoluting your input with.

This might be simpler than I thought and I am just over complicating things, who knows.

Thank you in advance for your assistance :) I really appreciate it
 

Attachments

  • fullsizeoutput_1462.jpeg
    fullsizeoutput_1462.jpeg
    40.6 KB · Views: 3,155
  • Screen Shot 2018-02-04 at 9.33.04 PM.png
    Screen Shot 2018-02-04 at 9.33.04 PM.png
    44.2 KB · Views: 2,821
Physics news on Phys.org
I haven't worked it out yet, but I have a question about terminology. It seems that the question is inferring that Impulse Response is the same as Step Response. Is that the way you are reading it?
 
scottdave said:
I haven't worked it out yet, but I have a question about terminology. It seems that the question is inferring that Impulse Response is the same as Step Response. Is that the way you are reading it?

Hello, I think that would be a typo. Sorry, I know it's misleading that they're asking for the impulse response and then on the figure label it says step response.
 
Just came across this today. Any remanent interest in this?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
5K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
6K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K