Determine the highest and lowest elevation on a path

  • Thread starter Thread starter Miley4567
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Path
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around determining the highest and lowest elevations given by the function z = f(x,y) = 1 - (1/16)x^2 - (1/9)y^2 along a specified path defined by the position vector r(t) = <2cos(t), 3sin(t)>. Participants are exploring how to express the function in terms of a single variable, t, to find extreme values.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss using the Lagrange Multiplier method but express confusion about how to convert the position vector into a suitable form for analysis. Some suggest rewriting the function as a function of t and using derivatives to find extrema.

Discussion Status

There is active exploration of different methods to approach the problem, with some participants questioning the appropriateness of Lagrange multipliers for this context. Suggestions for focusing questions and alternative methods are being discussed, indicating a productive exchange of ideas.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the challenge of working with a position vector and the need for clarity on how to derive a function suitable for finding maximum and minimum values. There is an acknowledgment of the limitations of Lagrange multipliers in this scenario.

Miley4567
Messages
3
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Determine the highest and lowest elevations given by the height
z = f(x,y) = 1 - (1/16)x^2 - (1/9)y^2
on the path r(t) = <2cos(t), 3sin(t)>. The xy position on the path at time t is given by r(t).

Homework Equations


Lagrange Multipliers
Partial derivatives

The Attempt at a Solution


I was going to try using the Lagrange Multiplier method to find the extreme values of the function f(x,y), but I would need the xy position to be given as an equation and in x and y terms. I am confused as to how to do this because we are given a position vector instead, in terms of t.

Could anyone help me out and guide me with how to do this?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Miley4567 said:

Homework Statement


Determine the highest and lowest elevations given by the height
z = f(x,y) = 1 - (1/16)x^2 - (1/9)y^2
on the path r(t) = <2cos(t), 3sin(t)>. The xy position on the path at time t is given by r(t).

Homework Equations


Lagrange Multipliers
Partial derivatives

The Attempt at a Solution


I was going to try using the Lagrange Multiplier method to find the extreme values of the function f(x,y), but I would need the xy position to be given as an equation and in x and y terms. I am confused as to how to do this because we are given a position vector instead, in terms of t.

Could anyone help me out and guide me with how to do this?
On the path, x(t) = 2cos(t), and y(t) = 3sin(t). So you could write f(x, y) as a function of t alone, and then use the derivative to find the maximum and minimum values. That's how I would approach this problem.
 
Before choosing the method, understand the problem.
The path is being given to you as a position vector that varies with t. What shape is the path?
As you travel along that path, how does z vary?

[edit] mark44 beat me to it.
 
Mark44 said:
On the path, x(t) = 2cos(t), and y(t) = 3sin(t). So you could write f(x, y) as a function of t alone, and then use the derivative to find the maximum and minimum values. That's how I would approach this problem.
That sounds like a good idea, I should have thought of that. But then I am confused as to how to turn the position vector into a function that I can use to find extreme values (min/max).
 
Miley4567 said:
That sounds like a good idea, I should have thought of that. But then I am confused as to how to turn the position vector into a function that I can use to find extreme values (min/max).

Here's what Mark44 said above:
Mark44 said:
On the path, x(t) = 2cos(t), and y(t) = 3sin(t). So you could write f(x, y) as a function of t alone, and then use the derivative to find the maximum and minimum values. That's how I would approach this problem.

Try that.
 
Miley4567 said:
That sounds like a good idea, I should have thought of that. But then I am confused as to how to turn the position vector into a function that I can use to find extreme values (min/max).
If you are having trouble understanding mark44's suggestion, try the focussing questions in post #3.
It is very difficult to tell you more detail without effectively telling you the answer too.
 
Miley4567 said:
That sounds like a good idea, I should have thought of that. But then I am confused as to how to turn the position vector into a function that I can use to find extreme values (min/max).
LCKurtz said:
Here's what Mark44 said above:Try that.
Ya I get that, but to use Lagrange Multipliers, I need two sets of equations, and plugging in the 2cost and 3sint into the f(x,y) equation still only leaves me with one equation to use to find a max and min.
 
So don't use Lagrange multipliers... have you heard of the 1st and second derivative tests?
 
Miley4567 said:
Ya I get that, but to use Lagrange Multipliers, I need two sets of equations, and plugging in the 2cost and 3sint into the f(x,y) equation still only leaves me with one equation to use to find a max and min.

I don't see why you would want or need to use Lagrange multipliers in this problem. Lagrange multipliers are designed to deal with certain types of problems, and this is not one of them.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K