Determine the kinetic energy of the emerging neutrons

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The kinetic energy of the emerging neutrons from the reaction p + 2713Al → 2714Si + n is calculated to be 1.004 MeV. The calculation involves conservation of energy and mass, where the total energy before the collision includes the kinetic energy of the protons and the rest mass energy of the aluminum nucleus. The final energy equation incorporates the mass of the silicon nucleus and the neutron, leading to the determination of the neutron's kinetic energy. The correct approach requires accounting for relativistic effects and the binding energy of the involved nuclei.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of relativistic kinetic energy calculations
  • Familiarity with nuclear reactions and conservation laws
  • Knowledge of binding energy concepts in nuclear physics
  • Ability to perform mass-energy equivalence calculations
NEXT STEPS
  • Study relativistic kinetic energy equations in particle physics
  • Learn about nuclear reaction mechanisms and energy conservation
  • Research binding energy calculations for various isotopes
  • Explore mass-energy equivalence and its applications in nuclear physics
USEFUL FOR

Physics students, nuclear physicists, and anyone interested in understanding particle collisions and energy transformations in nuclear reactions.

frankR
Messages
91
Reaction score
0
A beam of 6.61MeV protons is incident on a tanget of 2713Al. Those that collide produce the reaction

p + 2713Al ---> 2714Si + n

(2714Si has a mass of 26.986721amu.) Neglect any recoil of the product nucleous and determine the kinetic energy of the emerging neutrons.



Okay, what the heck is the idea here?

I tried conserving the mass and the energy. What am I missing?

The correct answer should be 1.00MeV, I get a number much bigger than that.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I tried conserving the mass and the energy. What am I missing?

Without seeing your work, it's hard to tell what you are missing. I remember in another thread you were using nonrelativistic KE in a relativistic particle collision problem. Could that be it?
 


Originally posted by Tom
Without seeing your work, it's hard to tell what you are missing. I remember in another thread you were using nonrelativistic KE in a relativistic particle collision problem. Could that be it?

Whatever I'm doing is way off the mark, so I didn't want to waste time typing it. I need to know the correct way to attack the problem before I start making calculations.

I started looking at it as a collision:

The protons are moving relativistically, I found their speed to be 3.56*10^7 m/s.

What happens during the collision. I know the Al picks up a proton and becomes Si and a nuetral particle is emitted. I looked the binding energy of Al, it comes out to be a really big number, but how much of that energy gives the n particle KE?

[?]
 
Frank,

Don't assume that it's not worth typing out just because your answer is way off. It may be a simple mistake that is easily identified.

Nevertheless...

Before Collision
The total energy of the proton is mpc2+KP, and the total energy of the Al nucleus is mAlc2. You were given Kp, and you'll have to look up mAl.

After Collision
The total energy of the Si nucleus is mSic2 (remember they said you could ignore its motion). The total energy of the neutron is mnc2+Kn. You were given the mass of the Si nucleus and you'll have to look up the mass of the neutron.

Since there is only one unknown here (Kn) you should be able to solve this in short order.
 
I got it.

kn = (mp - mSi - mn + mAl)*931.5MeV/amu + kp = 1.004MeV

I'm not sure what happened to the nucleon in this collisions/reaction, but I understand the procedure.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 54 ·
2
Replies
54
Views
11K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
6K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K