Determine the mass of the star?

  • Thread starter Thread starter ohheytai
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Mass Star
Click For Summary
To determine the mass of a star, the gravitational force acting on a planet in orbit is equated to the centripetal force required for circular motion. The relevant equations include Fc = Fg = GMstarMplanet / R^2 and Fc = Mplanet v^2 / R. By rearranging these equations, the mass of the star can be expressed as Mstar = 4π²R³ / GT², where R, T, and G are known quantities. The discussion emphasizes that the gravitational force serves as the centripetal force in orbital motion. The approach is validated through dimensional analysis, confirming that the derived expression for the star's mass is correct.
ohheytai
Messages
81
Reaction score
0
Uploaded the PDF someone please help me i have no idea what to do!



Homework Equations


(-G*m1*m2)/r^2
dP/dt



The Attempt at a Solution


I don't even know where to start i drew everything out and i think dP/dT is 0 cause its at a constant speed someone please help! :(
 

Attachments

Physics news on Phys.org
At constant speed in circular motion, acceleration would be constant towards the centre, creating the centripetal force, Fc.

In the case of orbit, Fc = Fg = GMstarMplanet / R2

R, T and G are given, so all you need to do is to derive the mass of the planet in terms of the given quantities.

Rearranging the expression to find star's mass, I get:
Mstar = Fc R2 / G Mplanet

The only unknowns left will be Fc and mass of planet.

However, it is known that Fc = Mplanet v2 / R. Thus, the mass of planet in Fc can be canceled with the mass of planet in my arranged expression above to give:

Mstar = v2 R / G

v = 2pi R / T (given in question as well), thus, final expression being:

Mstar = 4 pi2 R 3 / G T 2

This is just my first try. please let me know if I've made any errors or if you disagree.
 
is it possible to do this without centripetal force? and using vectors?
 
Dimension for G is m3 kg-1 s-2, making the overall expression's dimension kg as well. So my expression SHOULD be correct.
 
ohheytai said:
is it possible to do this without centripetal force? and using vectors?

The purpose of this problem is to emphasize that in an orbit, the centripetal force is the gravitational force, and thus using simple algebra, master the variables of the expression for Fg.

Vectors will point only the tangential velocity and Fc, but to determine the mass, you need expression for Fg.
 
okay thank youuu!
 
Thread 'Correct statement about size of wire to produce larger extension'
The answer is (B) but I don't really understand why. Based on formula of Young Modulus: $$x=\frac{FL}{AE}$$ The second wire made of the same material so it means they have same Young Modulus. Larger extension means larger value of ##x## so to get larger value of ##x## we can increase ##F## and ##L## and decrease ##A## I am not sure whether there is change in ##F## for first and second wire so I will just assume ##F## does not change. It leaves (B) and (C) as possible options so why is (C)...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
943
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
1K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
678
Replies
4
Views
835
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
Replies
25
Views
3K