Determing the direction of dl when calculating V

  • Thread starter Thread starter kc8ukw
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Direction
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around determining the direction of the differential length vector dl when calculating electric potential V due to a point charge. The original poster explores the relationship between electric field and potential, specifically through the integral of E*dl.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to understand the implications of integrating from different limits and how the direction of dl affects the outcome. Some participants question the reasoning behind the choice of direction for dl in spherical coordinates.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging with the original poster's confusion regarding the direction of dl and its impact on the calculation of potential. There is a mix of clarifications and examples being shared, but no consensus has been reached on the original poster's misunderstanding.

Contextual Notes

The discussion involves the use of spherical coordinates and the definitions of vectors in that context, which may contribute to the confusion regarding the direction of dl.

kc8ukw
Messages
1
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Hi. I'm wondering how one determines the direction of dl (vector) when calculating V, the electric potential. So, suppose we want to calculate the electric potential caused by a point charge q at a distance a from the point charge, if we know the electric field of a point charge.

Homework Equations



The textbook I have says to calculate the potential by Va - Vb = integral from a to b of E*dl.

The Attempt at a Solution



So, I can let b = infinity, to get Va - Vinfinity = integral from a to infinity of k*q/r2 dr, where I have said that dl = dr*rhat, since I am integrating from r = a to r = infinity. Doing the integral, and assuming Vinfinity = 0, I get the correct answer,

V = kq/a.

But suppose instead that I had integrated from infinity to a instead of the other way. So,

Vinfinity - Va = integral from infinity to a of E*dl.

Now, since I am coming from infinity toward a, I make dl = -dr*rhat. That introduces one negative sign. But the order of integration is also flipped, which introduces another. BUT, since I have Vinfinity - Va, that introduces a third negative, so I end up with

V = -kq/a

the opposite of what I got before, and the wrong answer. Where did I go wrong? I'm guessing it must have been when I said that dl = -dr*rhat - but why isn't that correct? What sets the proper direction of dl?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
welcome to pf!

hi kc8ukw! welcome to pf! :smile:

(have an infinity: ∞ and an integral: ∫ :wink:)

i'm not following your argument :confused:

the potential V is defined by …

V(R) - V(∞) = ∫R E(r) dr …

what exactly are you saying?
 
Hi Kc8ukw,
For your particular problem, (E in the [itex]\hat{r}[/itex] direction), d[itex]\vec{l}[/itex] is in the direction of [itex]\hat{r}[/itex] (you know this already). But in spherical coordinates [itex]\hat{r}[/itex] always points radially outward. But radially outward can point, for instance, along the [itex]\hat{x}[/itex] direction or along the -[itex]\hat{x}[/itex] direction. Both of these directions, [itex]\hat{x}[/itex] and -[itex]\hat{x}[/itex], are called [itex]\hat{r}[/itex] when we are in spherical coordinates. This is because in general the direction of [itex]\hat{r}[/itex] depends on the angles θ and [itex]\phi[/itex]. So your d[itex]\vec{l}[/itex] vector here is in the direction called [itex]\hat{r}[/itex] (not -[itex]\hat{r}[/itex]!) regardless of if it points in from infinity or out to infinity.

An example from Griffiths's awesome book: Introduction to Electrodynamics might help:
Imagine two vectors [itex]\vec{A}[/itex] = [itex]\hat{y}[/itex] and [itex]\vec{B}[/itex]= -[itex]\hat{y}[/itex]. Both of these vectors are called [itex]\hat{r}[/itex] is spherical coordinates and in particular [itex]\vec{A}[/itex]+ [itex]\vec{B}[/itex] is 0 NOT 2[itex]\hat{r}[/itex]!
 
welcome to pf!

hi finnsmama! welcome to pf! :smile:

but that wasn't yesterday, it was last year …

i don't think kc8ukw is coming back! :wink:
 
Hey Tiny tim,
yeah, I knew that...but people search for answers to questions all the time and this one was not answered...and I had just gone over this in class! So answering seemed the right thing to do...
 

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
64
Views
6K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K