Determining a Scattering Cross Section (Quantum Mechanics)

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on determining the scattering cross section, ##\sigma##, for a particle of mass ##m## interacting with a potential defined as $$U(r) = 0$$ for ##r \geq b## and $$U(r) = W$$ for ##r < b##. The primary method suggested is partial wave analysis, utilizing the equation $$\sigma = \frac{4 \pi}{k^2} \sum_{l} (2l+1) \text{sin}^2 \delta_l$$ to find phase shifts, ##\delta_l##. The key conclusion is that the limit of the cross section as ##b \to 0## does not depend on the energy ##E## of the particle, emphasizing the dominance of s-wave scattering when ##b << 1/k##.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quantum mechanics, particularly scattering theory.
  • Familiarity with partial wave analysis and spherical Bessel functions.
  • Knowledge of phase shifts in quantum scattering.
  • Basic grasp of potential energy functions in quantum mechanics.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of phase shifts, ##\delta_l##, in quantum scattering problems.
  • Learn about the implications of the Born approximation in scattering theory.
  • Explore the properties of spherical Bessel functions and their applications in quantum mechanics.
  • Investigate the relationship between scattering cross sections and potential shapes in quantum systems.
USEFUL FOR

Students and researchers in quantum mechanics, particularly those focusing on scattering theory, as well as educators seeking to clarify concepts related to phase shifts and cross sections in particle interactions.

CDL
Messages
20
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


Consider scattering of a particle of mass ##m## on the potential
$$U(r) = \begin{cases}
0, & r \geq b\\
W, & r < b \\
\end{cases}$$
Where ##W## is some arbitrary chosen constant, and the radius ##b## is considered a small parameter. Find the cross section ##\sigma## in the limit ##b \to 0## (to avoid confusion, find the first non-zero term in the expansion of ##\sigma## over ##b##). Prove in particular, that the limit does not depend on the energy ##E## of the particle.

Homework Equations


I am thinking of using partial wave analysis for this problem, since we have a "localised" potential. In particular, using

$$\sigma = \frac{4 \pi}{k^2} \sum_{l} (2l+1) \text{sin}^2 \delta_l$$
One thing that I am struggling to get my head around is how to find the phase shifts, ##\delta_l##. After some searching around, I found the following formulas (not that I really understand them), $$\text{tan}\delta_l = \frac{k a j'_l(kb) - \beta_{l +} j_l(kb)}{kay'_{l}(ka) - \beta_{l+} y_l(ka)}$$ Where ##j## and ##y## denote the spherical Bessel functions. Also, $$\beta_{l+} = \frac{1}{\mathcal{R}} \frac{d\mathcal{R}}{dr} \bigg\rvert_{r = b}$$ with $$\mathcal{R} = e^{i \delta_l} \left(\text{cos}\delta_l \ j_l(kr) -\text{sin}\delta_l \ y_l(kr)\right)$$

The Attempt at a Solution



After using the equations in the above section, and 2 pages of working, I didn't get far. Those equation don't seem to use any information about the form of potential. I wanted to find the partial wave phase shifts until I hit the first non-zero one, and then sub it into the expansion for ##\sigma##. I'm not sure how this would correspond to the first term in the expansion of ##\sigma## over ##b## though.

My whole understanding of this topic is kind of shaky, and reading Griffiths and the lecture notes doesn't seem to be getting me very far. Any suggestions on how to get a good grasp of this stuff?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Well, I am still researching this but I thought I would get back to you with the one consideration I have found so far. That is, if ##b<<1/k## where ##k## is the incident wave vector then s wave scattering ##(l=0)## dominates. But then, maybe you already knew that.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
739
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
Replies
46
Views
2K