Determining best method for volumes?

  • Thread starter Thread starter dnt
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Method Volumes
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on determining the best method for calculating volumes of solids of revolution using integration, specifically the disk, washer, and shell methods. The choice of method depends on the axis of revolution and the specific functions defining the boundaries of the shape. For instance, when revolving the area under the graph of e^(-x) and x over the interval [1,2] around the x-axis, the disk method is preferred, while the shell method is more suitable for revolution around the y-axis. Ultimately, the simplest integral should guide the selection of the method.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of integration techniques in calculus
  • Familiarity with the disk, washer, and shell methods for volume calculation
  • Knowledge of functions and their graphs
  • Ability to identify axes of revolution
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the disk method for calculating volumes of revolution
  • Explore the shell method and its applications in volume calculations
  • Practice problems involving the washer method for various shapes
  • Analyze the impact of different axes of revolution on volume calculations
USEFUL FOR

Students and educators in calculus, particularly those focusing on volume calculations of solids of revolution, as well as anyone seeking to deepen their understanding of integration methods in mathematical analysis.

dnt
Messages
238
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



No specific question but what is the best way to determine which method is the best for solving for volumes (using integration) of shapes as they revolve around axis/lines. disk method? washer method? shell method? other?

what exactly do you look for that may hint towards one method over the other?

Homework Equations



n/a

The Attempt at a Solution

 
Physics news on Phys.org
It depends on what axis they're revolving.
 
Which is better depends not only about which axis they are revolving but also the specific form of the functions describing the boundaries. About the only thing one can say in general is to consider each and decide which gives the simplest integral.
 
well you only have two axis, right? if its x which is best? if its y which is best?
 
to do volume with calculus: whether you chop the object up into thin disks or thin shells depends highly on the shape of the object. eg: consider the area under the graph e^(-x) and x in [1,2], if vol. is formed by revolving this area about x axis, then disk method is the natural choice, whereas if revolved about y axis, then shell method would be better.
 
why? what made you pick one over the other? what specifics do you look for that would cause you to lean towards one method over the other?
 
Because one of the methods is easier than the other. In certain situations, the shell method is easier to do than the disk method.

And we all know mathematicians are lazy. ;)

Think about it this way: if you were to find the area of a cone (y = x) that revolved around the x-axis, you'ld use the disk method. Not saying that you can't use the shell method, but its just easier to use disk.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
3K