Determining Forces on Pipes and Rollers - Get Help Here!

  • Thread starter Thread starter TSN79
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Forces Pipes
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around determining forces acting on two pipes and a roller, with emphasis on graphical and analytical methods for solving torque-related problems. The original poster seeks assistance in calculating these forces, particularly in a graphical context.

Discussion Character

  • Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore graphical versus analytical methods for determining forces, with some suggesting free body diagrams and torque considerations. Questions arise about the terminology of a 'roller' and its implications for the problem setup.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging with the problem, offering guidance on free body analysis and torque. There is recognition of the challenges in achieving a graphical solution, with some participants questioning the requirements set by the textbook.

Contextual Notes

There is mention of assumptions regarding friction and the need for distances to be known or assumed for the second problem. The discussion reflects on the constraints of solving the problem graphically as per the book's instructions.

TSN79
Messages
422
Reaction score
0
The drawing below shows two pipes lying on top of each other. Forces act on the different contact points, and I am to determine these as a result of the pipes' weight G. I'm able to do this graphically, but not by calculation.

Next up is a similar problem, I'm to determine the forces at A and B, where B is a roller. Here I'm able to do it analytically, but not graphically.

If someone could help me I'd really appreciate it :smile:
 

Attachments

  • pipes.jpg
    pipes.jpg
    10.8 KB · Views: 501
  • beam.jpg
    beam.jpg
    5.5 KB · Views: 481
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I'm not quite sure what you mean by the second problem so I will try and point you in the right direction on the first: Consider each pipe as a free body and recall that you can sum up forces whose lines of action pass through a common point which, because I am assuming no friction (because you didn't mention any) and the fact that all surfaces are tangential, is the center of each pipe.
 

Looks like a simple torque questio to me. What do you mean by a 'roller' at B? Which way can it rotate?

~H
 
A roller is a type of connection. Just terminology. It only has a normal force.
 
cyrusabdollahi said:
A roller is a type of connection. Just terminology. It only has a normal force.

Ahh, thank you cyrus. I apologise for my ignorace; I've never heard of the term before, it is a term specific to engineering?

To TSN
In light of cyrus' information, this question is definatly a simple torque question.

~H
 
I know it's a question of torque, but I can't figure out how to solve it graphically. In a graphical solution all the forces need to make an enclosed polygon, which you can use to measure the length (and therefore their magnetude). But here I can't seem to make that work.
 
TSN79 said:
In a graphical solution all the forces need to make an enclosed polygon, which you can use to measure the length (and therefore their magnetude). But here I can't seem to make that work.

This method does not work with torques I'm afraid. Is it a requirment that you solve it graphically?

~H
 
Well, the book says to find the reactions by A and B graphically...there is no way?
 
TSN79 said:
Well, the book says to find the reactions by A and B graphically...there is no way?

I Suppose one could measure the distances and length of F to find the torqures involved but this still would required some calculation, would this be considered graphically by your book?

~H
 
  • #10
For the second problem, you will need to know or then assume a distance from A where the force is located before you can solve the problem.
 
  • #11
civil_dude said:
For the second problem, you will need to know or then assume a distance from A where the force is located before you can solve the problem.

Thats what I meant when I said measure. That is ofcourse assuming that the diagram is drawn to scale.

~H
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
6K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
4K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
1K