Determining Maximum Lamp Mass for Coplanar Force System

  • Thread starter Thread starter Robb
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Force Systems
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around determining the maximum mass of a lamp supported by a cord system, ensuring that no single cord experiences a tension exceeding 350 N. The problem involves analyzing forces in a coplanar force system, likely within the context of static equilibrium.

Discussion Character

  • Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore various force balance equations and free body diagrams (FBDs) to analyze the tensions in the cords. There are attempts to relate the forces in terms of the weight of the lamp (W) and to express tensions in one cord in terms of another.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging with the problem, offering insights and corrections regarding the setup of equations and the relationships between the forces. Some guidance has been provided on how to express tensions in terms of W, and there is recognition of the importance of identifying which rope experiences maximum tension.

Contextual Notes

There are indications of confusion regarding substitutions in the equations and the need for careful consideration of the free body diagrams. Some participants note discrepancies in the values used for W, suggesting a need for clarification on the correct weight to consider.

Robb
Messages
225
Reaction score
8

Homework Statement


Hibbeler14.ch3.p30.jpg


Determine the maximum mass of the lamp that the cord system can support so that no single cord develops a tension exceeding 350 N

Homework Equations



upload_2016-9-27_8-19-15.png

The Attempt at a Solution



F(x)=0; F(ED)cos30 - F(CD)= 0
F(y)=0; F(ED)sin30 - W

F(ED)= 2W
F(CD)= 1.73205W

F(X)=0; 1.73205W - F(AC)(3/5) - F(CD)cos45 = 0
F(y)=0; F(AC)(4/5) - F(BC)sin45 = 0

F(AC)= F(BC).88388

This is where I start getting confused. With all the substitutions.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Robb said:
F(X)=0; 1.73205W - F(AC)(3/5) - F(CD)cos45 = 0

This is incorrect. Check your FBD and make sure you're writing out your equation with the correct subscripts.
 
From the lower fbd:
F(x)= 0; 1.73205W - F(AC)(3/5) - F(BC)cos45
 
Robb said:
From the lower fbd:
F(x)= 0; 1.73205W - F(AC)(3/5) - F(BC)cos45

Alright, so substitute in for F(AC) in this equation. Use this to write F(BC) in terms of W. Afterwards you can then write F(AC) in terms of W. You will then have expressions for all the forces of tension in the ropes in terms of W. Comparing all of these you should be able to determine which rope develops the maximum tension in this system.
 
Also, as a quick alternative to going through all the math: Examine each FBD carefully. Assuming static equilibrium of the ring at point D, it can be said that F(DE) must be larger in magnitude than F(CD) since only one component of F(DE) balances the force F(CD). A slightly more careful consideration of how this strategy applies to the FBD of point C should lead you to find which rope is under the maximum tension. As you can see, most of the trouble in this problem is finding that particular rope.
 
So, F(AC) = .88388F(BC)
1.73205W - F(BC).53033 - F(BC).7071 = 0
-1.23743F(BC) + 1.73205W
F(BC) = 1.39971W

F(AC) = 1.23718W

W = 150

The answer is 17.8? Not sure how to get there.
 
Tallus Bryne said:
Also, as a quick alternative to going through all the math: Examine each FBD carefully. Assuming static equilibrium of the ring at point D, it can be said that F(DE) must be larger in magnitude than F(CD) since only one component of F(DE) balances the force F(CD). A slightly more careful consideration of how this strategy applies to the FBD of point C should lead you to find which rope is under the maximum tension. As you can see, most of the trouble in this problem is finding that particular rope.

I like the insight. Now that you mention it it looks obvious.
 
Robb said:
So, F(AC) = .88388F(BC)
1.73205W - F(BC).53033 - F(BC).7071 = 0
-1.23743F(BC) + 1.73205W
F(BC) = 1.39971W

F(AC) = 1.23718W

W = 150

The answer is 17.8? Not sure how to get there.
See edit to W.
 
Ok. I got it. Sorry. Thanks for your help!
 
  • #10
Robb said:
W = 150

Robb said:
Ok. I got it. Sorry. Thanks for your help!

No problem. Just one last thing.
Not sure if your edit on your post for the value of W worked. Just to clarify it should be 175 N. Although I will assume that you must have gotten that result if you calculated 17.8 kg as the mass.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
9K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
1K
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
6K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
39
Views
5K