Determining Quotient Group (\mathbb{Z}_2\times\mathbb{Z}_4)/\langle(1,2)\rangle

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around determining the structure of the quotient group (\mathbb{Z}_2\times\mathbb{Z}_4)/\langle(1,2)\rangle, focusing on its properties and potential isomorphisms to known groups.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the nature of the subgroup \langle(1,2)\rangle and its implications for the quotient group. Questions arise regarding the cyclic nature of the potential quotient groups and their isomorphism to known structures.

Discussion Status

Several participants have offered insights into the properties of the groups involved, with some suggesting that the quotient group is cyclic. There is an ongoing exploration of the implications of the subgroup's order and its effect on the quotient group structure.

Contextual Notes

Participants are navigating through definitions and properties of cyclic groups and subgroup orders, questioning assumptions about the nature of the groups involved. The discussion includes clarifications on the definitions of cyclic groups and the conditions under which subgroups are normal.

  • #31
Just because

\phi(ab) = \phi(a)\phi(b)

for some particular a and b does not imply that it works for every a and b. This is the problem. A homomorphism requires it to work for any choices. Thus you didn't prove that anything was a homomorphism or a bijection (although it is certainly possible to find bijections and homomorphisms between the two. It is not possible to find an isomorphism, ie. a function that is both a bijection and a homomorphism. This is what you need to prove).

And actually I spoke a little too soon in my last post (I need to read more carefully!). In Q, we find A^4B^2 =e(-e) = - e \neq e but in {\cal D}_4 we find R^4 \rho^2 = ee = e. So your example doesn't quite work anyways.

The most clear path to prove what you need is that that Muzza suggested:

Prove that if f(x) is an isomorphism between to groups then \mbox{ord}f(x) = \mbox{ord}x and then use the fact that I gave above of unequal numbers of elements of certain orders to get your result.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
Thanks Data. That is what I wanted to hear. And Muzza's post was most helpful too. I will post back with another attempt later.

Thankyou guys.

By the way Muzza, your "framework" proof, is exactly the path I was trying to take (same idea). Except mine came out all fuzzy. :frown:
 
Last edited:
  • #33
If Q and \mathcal{D}_4 are groups, and \phi : Q \rightarrow \mathcal{D}_4 is an isomorphism. Then for all x \in Q,

|\phi(x)| = |x|

That is, \phi maps from exactly one element in Q to exactly one element in \mathcal{D}_4.

Suppose that \phi is an isomorphism. Denote a to be rotation and b to be reflection in \mathcal{D}_4. Then there are three elements in \mathcal{D}_4 with order 2:

a^2, b, ab^2

In Q there is only one element of order 2:

A^2

where A is the 2x2 matrix that I typed earlier.

So if |A| = 2 then

|\phi(A)| = |a^2| = |b| = |ab^2| \in \mathcal{D}_4

Thus \phi is not an isomorphism.
 
  • #34
I want to look closer into the dihedral group \mathcal{D}_n. Where

\mathcal{D}_n = \{a,b | a^n = b^2 = e, \, bab = a^{-1}\}.

I want to find all normal subgroups and then determine the corresponding quotient groups.


A subgroup H of a group G is normal if

gHg^{-1} = H \quad \forall \, g \in G

Take n to be odd. If we apply rotation a to the n-gon in the positive sense, and proceed to apply it in the negative sense, then we haven't rotated the n-gon at all.

Im talking jibberish. How am I supposed to find the normal subgroups of this group? What are they going to look like? Subsets? I don't know...
 
  • #35
Note, that if this was a specific dihedral group \mathcal{D}_3 or something. Then I would write up the multiplication table, work out the subgroups, and then determine which are normal by applying

gH = Hg \, \forall \, g\in G

But I have no idea how to start doing this problem when n is arbitrary.
 
  • #36
Ok I may have something.

Dihedral groups are special groups that consist of rotations a and relfections b, where the group operation is the composition of these rotations and reflections.

The finite dihedral group \mathcal{D}_n has 2n elements and is generated by a (with order n) and b (with order 2). The two elements of the dihedral group satsify

ab = ba^{-1}

If the order of \mathcal{D}_{n} is greater than 4, then the group operations do not commute, ie \mathcal{D}_n is not abelian.

The 2n elements of \mathcal{D}_n are

\{e, a, a^2, \dots , a^{n-1}, b, ba, ba^2, \dots , ba^{n-1}\}

Now, in order to form the quotient groups, I need to find the normal subgroups. The normal subgroups are those which are invariant under conjugation.

I know \{e\} and \{\mathcal{D}_n\] are going to normal subgroups. But I don't know how to find any others.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
12K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
1K