Determining the Coefficient of Kinetic Friction on an Incline

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on determining the coefficient of kinetic friction (μ_k) between a block and a wooden plank on an incline set at an angle of 18°. The user has successfully calculated the coefficient of static friction as 0.32 but is uncertain about the procedure for finding μ_k without knowing the mass of the block. The suggested approach involves adjusting the incline to achieve a constant speed for the block, which simplifies the calculations by eliminating the need for mass in the equations.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of free body diagrams (FBD)
  • Knowledge of Newton's laws of motion
  • Familiarity with the concepts of static and kinetic friction
  • Basic trigonometry for calculating angles and forces
NEXT STEPS
  • Learn how to calculate the coefficient of kinetic friction using constant velocity methods
  • Research the role of mass in friction experiments and its impact on results
  • Explore the use of timing devices to measure acceleration and distance in friction experiments
  • Investigate the effects of different surface materials on friction coefficients
USEFUL FOR

Students conducting physics experiments, educators teaching concepts of friction, and anyone interested in the practical applications of Newtonian mechanics.

Polus
Messages
4
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


I am conducting an experiment to determine the coefficient of static and kinetic friction between 2 objects I've arbitrarily chosen. I have a block and a plank of wood. I have been raising the plank to an incline to determine at what angle the block will begin sliding.

I was given no data, I'm measuring everything myself. I have determined that the angle of incline or θ = 18°. I then drew a FBD and determined the coefficient of static friction which I found to be 0.32.

The part I'm stuck on is question #3: "Now, using the same tools, figure out a procedure to determine the coefficient of kinetic friction. State your procedure."

I'm stuck because question #5 then asks: "Was it necessary to know the mass of the object to perform this activity? State how you can prove that mass is/is not necessary"

I've been trying to solve the coefficient of kinetic friction between the block and plank of wood without mass first because I don't want to lose marks by arguing the incorrect conclusion.



2. The attempt at a solution
I attached the FBD, it's not the best image but I thought it'd be worth it to upload it. :P

I tried to come up with an equation which would let me solve for μ_k. The best I could come up with was: a_x = gsin(θ) - μ_k gcos(θ)

I assumed that F_{netx} = F_{gx} - F_k

I feel as if I'm on the right track (if it is even possible to find μ_k like this) as I have eliminated mass but I don't know what to do with the a_x.

Also, 18° was the angle I used for determining the coefficient of static friction. Am I wrong to use 18° for determining kinetic friction?


By the way, my tools are a protractor, ruler, my horizontal plane (the plank), and object used to slide (block). If I take question #3 literally I don't know how I would be able to determine the mass of my object. Although, I do roughly know the mass of my object. I was also thinking I could use Δd to determine acceleration but without a watch of some sort included in my list of tools I don't know if I am meant to use Δt in my equations.

This is my first post so I am sorry if it is formatted improperly (I tried my best!). Critiques to the formatting of my post would be much appreciated. Thanks!
 

Attachments

  • FBD 001.jpg
    FBD 001.jpg
    24.3 KB · Views: 798
Physics news on Phys.org
Polus said:
I tried to come up with an equation which would let me solve for μ_k. The best I could come up with was: a_x = gsin(θ) - μ_k gcos(θ)

I assumed that F_{netx} = F_{gx} - F_k

I feel as if I'm on the right track (if it is even possible to find μ_k like this) as I have eliminated mass but I don't know what to do with the a_x.

Hello, Polus, and welcome to PF!

I think you have a very good start! Suppose you fiddle with the angle so that, after giving the block a little push to get it started, it slides with a slow constant speed down the slope. Would this help with what to do with ax? Of course, there will be some error in deciding whether or not the speed is constant. But if you play around with it, I think you can get a decent result.
 
Thanks, TSny. I consulted my teacher and she told me exactly what you did. :P
 
That's good. Have fun with the experiment!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
6K
Replies
48
Views
8K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
6K
Replies
43
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
1K