Determining the function using graphs

  • Thread starter Thread starter McKeavey
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Function Graphs
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around determining a mathematical function based on graphical data, specifically examining the relationship between weight and distance. The original poster grapples with identifying the appropriate equations and methods for analysis.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the idea of using logarithmic scales to analyze the relationship between weight and distance, questioning how to derive the exponent in a power law relationship. There is also discussion about the implications of plotting log-transformed variables.

Discussion Status

Some participants have suggested methods for visualizing the data, such as plotting log(weight) against log(distance) to identify linear relationships. Others express uncertainty about the concepts and calculations involved, indicating a lack of consensus on the next steps.

Contextual Notes

There is a noted lack of familiarity with physics concepts among some participants, and the original poster expresses confusion about the problem and its requirements. The discussion includes references to specific equations and constants, but these are not universally understood by all participants.

McKeavey
Messages
30
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Shown in picture Attachment
Question #2.


Homework Equations


Not sure..That's what I'm supposed to figure out.


The Attempt at a Solution


Well I've graphed the points..That's about it hah.
Seems like a Log graph flipped on the x-axis.
 

Attachments

  • 308891_10150796188050215_848455214_20840885_1983052802_n.jpg
    308891_10150796188050215_848455214_20840885_1983052802_n.jpg
    54.3 KB · Views: 479
Physics news on Phys.org
What if you assume that the dependence of the weight on distance follows some sort of power law i.e. [itex]w \propto r^a[/itex]? Can you think of something you can do to both quantities before plotting them that would make it easy to measure 'a' just by looking at the plot?
 
Last edited:
I'm still not sure, I haven't done physics in about a year, and my mind is pretty much fresh..
The answers are ..
W = Kd^-2

K = 6.4x10^3 N(MR)^3

Please help me..I really don't understand anything.. :(
 
McKeavey said:
I'm still not sure, I haven't done physics in about a year, and my mind is pretty much fresh..
The answers are ..
W = Kd^-2

K = 6.4x10^3 N(MR)^3

Please help me..I really don't understand anything.. :(

What if you plotted both weight and distance on log scales (i.e. take log(w) and log(r)). What happens if you do that (just do it now to both sides of the equation). Can you see how this would make it possible to figure out that a = -2 just from the graph?
 
Ohh, yes hahh, I can see a = -2.
What about K?
 
McKeavey said:
Ohh, yes hahh, I can see a = -2.
What about K?

Well, if w = Kra, where K is some constant of proportionality, then it follows that:

log(w) = log(Kra) = alog(Kr) by the properties of logs.

But the log of a product is the sum of the logs of the individual factors so that:

alog(Kr) = alog(K) + alog(r)

So, if you plot log(w) vs. log(r), I think you can see that it will be linear and the slope of the line gives you a, while the offset (w-intercept) of the line gives you K.
 
Ugh what do you mean it will be linear when I plot log(w) vs. log(r)?

You mean line of best fit? :S
 
McKeavey said:
Ugh what do you mean it will be linear when I plot log(w) vs. log(r)?

You mean line of best fit? :S

I just showed you that log(w) varies linearly with log(r)! From my previous post:

log(w) = alog(r) + alog(K).

This is in the form of the standard equation for a straight line y = mx + b, with:
y = log(w),
m = a,
x = log(r), and
b = alog(K).

So, if you plot log(w) vs. log(r), you should get a straight line and you can measure its slope (m) and y-intercept (b). I don't know how to make it any clearer than that.
 
oh sorry sorry.
I got b = 3
and m = 4
(assuming these are wrong.. ugh)

What do I do with these?
Sorry I'm just really clueless at the moment..
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
9K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
7K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K