Determining the rank of a matrix

  • Thread starter Thread starter influx
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Matrix rank
Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
6 replies · 2K views
influx
Messages
162
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


2136c8.png


Homework Equations


N/A

The Attempt at a Solution


I know that they got a rank of 2 since there are 2 linearly independent columns but what if we decided to count rows? In that case we would have 4 linearly independent rows which would suggest the rank is 4? How do we reconcile between these?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
influx said:

Homework Statement


2136c8.png


Homework Equations


N/A

The Attempt at a Solution


I know that they got a rank of 2 since there are 2 linearly independent columns but what if we decided to count rows? In that case we would have 4 linearly independent rows which would suggest the rank is 4? How do we reconcile between these?

No. Just because you have 4 rows does not mean you have 4 independent rows. In fact, you can have at most 2 independent vectors of dimension 2!

In fact, you can see that Row_3 = 2*Row_2 - Row_1 and Row_4 = - Row_1 - 4*Row_2..

REMEMBER: in any matrix, the number of linearly-independent rows equals the number of linearly-independent columns. That is an important basic theorem of linear algebra.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Delta2
Ray Vickson said:
OK: I found the wording confusing.
He claimed the rows to be linear independent, so to ask for a proof seemed to be logic. Thus he would have learned multiple things: don't claim, what you cannot prove, the calculations with linear dependencies and linear independencies are basically the same, and a (failed) proof would have simultaneously shown two free parameters solving the dimension formula. All within this tiny example.