Determining the rank of a matrix

  • Thread starter Thread starter influx
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Matrix rank
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around determining the rank of a matrix, specifically addressing the relationship between linearly independent columns and rows. Participants explore the implications of counting both rows and columns in assessing rank.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking, Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Some participants question the original poster's assertion regarding the rank based on rows versus columns, suggesting a need to prove linear independence. Others discuss the implications of linear dependence and independence in the context of the matrix's dimensions.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants providing guidance on proving linear independence and clarifying concepts. There is an exploration of different interpretations regarding the rank of the matrix and the definitions involved.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the importance of understanding that the number of linearly independent rows cannot exceed the number of linearly independent columns, highlighting a fundamental theorem of linear algebra. There is also mention of potential confusion in terminology related to linear independence and dependence.

influx
Messages
162
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


2136c8.png


Homework Equations


N/A

The Attempt at a Solution


I know that they got a rank of 2 since there are 2 linearly independent columns but what if we decided to count rows? In that case we would have 4 linearly independent rows which would suggest the rank is 4? How do we reconcile between these?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You should try to prove the linear independence of the four rows. Or simply draw them in a plane.
 
influx said:

Homework Statement


2136c8.png


Homework Equations


N/A

The Attempt at a Solution


I know that they got a rank of 2 since there are 2 linearly independent columns but what if we decided to count rows? In that case we would have 4 linearly independent rows which would suggest the rank is 4? How do we reconcile between these?

No. Just because you have 4 rows does not mean you have 4 independent rows. In fact, you can have at most 2 independent vectors of dimension 2!

In fact, you can see that Row_3 = 2*Row_2 - Row_1 and Row_4 = - Row_1 - 4*Row_2..

REMEMBER: in any matrix, the number of linearly-independent rows equals the number of linearly-independent columns. That is an important basic theorem of linear algebra.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Delta2
fresh_42 said:
You should try to prove the linear independence of the four rows. Or simply draw them in a plane.

I hope you mean linear dependence.
 
Ray Vickson said:
I hope you mean linear dependence.
No, I meant linear independency. My goal was to let the OP see by himself why this won't be possible and learn out of it.
 
fresh_42 said:
No, I meant linear independency. My goal was to let the OP see by himself why this won't be possible and learn out of it.

OK: I found the wording confusing.
 
Ray Vickson said:
OK: I found the wording confusing.
He claimed the rows to be linear independent, so to ask for a proof seemed to be logic. Thus he would have learned multiple things: don't claim, what you cannot prove, the calculations with linear dependencies and linear independencies are basically the same, and a (failed) proof would have simultaneously shown two free parameters solving the dimension formula. All within this tiny example.
 

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
8K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K