Determining velocity for a pulley/rope system

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on a physics problem involving a pulley system where a crewman is lowering a crate and subsequently slips on ice. The crate, initially lowered at a constant speed, accelerates downward after the crewman loses his grip, raising questions about the final speeds of both the crate and the crewman. Participants emphasize the need to apply Newton's Second Law correctly, noting that three forces act on the crewman, including gravitational force. There is also a clarification that the kinematics of the crate should not be assumed but rather derived from the problem's conditions. The conversation highlights the importance of accurately analyzing forces and motion in such scenarios.
Katatatat
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
The Question:
Using a simply pulley/rope system, a crewman on an Arctic expedition is trying to lower a 5.65-kg crate to the bottom of a steep ravine of height 23.9 meters. The 60.9-kg crewman is walking along holding the rope, being careful to lower the crate at a constant speed of 1.50 m/s. Unfortunately, when the crate reaches a point 13.3 meters above the ground, the crewman steps on a slick patch of ice and slips. The crate immediately accelerates toward the ground, dragging the hapless crewman across the ice and toward the edge of the cliff.

If we assume the ice is perfectly slick (that is, no friction between the crewman and the ice once he slips and falls down), at what speed will the crate hit the ground? Assume also that the rope is long enough to allow the crate to hit the ground before the crewman slides over the side of the cliff. At what speed will the crewman hit the bottom of the ravine?​
The Relevant Equations:
F = ma
Equations for one-dimensional kinematics​
The Attempt:
I've looked at the forces for the crewman and crate separately with free-body diagrams, applying Newton's Second Law and using the following formulas to solve for acceleration, although I'm not entirely sure that is correct:
T - m1g = m1a
m2g - T = m2a​
As for the kinematics portion of the question, I assume the crate will follow a simple one-dimensional formula, while the crewman will have a projectile motion.​
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF;
The equations are not correct. There are 3 forces on the crewman.
Which direction does the crewman's weight act?

As for the kinematics... don't assume: the problem tells you what sort of motion to expect.
 
Thread 'Correct statement about size of wire to produce larger extension'
The answer is (B) but I don't really understand why. Based on formula of Young Modulus: $$x=\frac{FL}{AE}$$ The second wire made of the same material so it means they have same Young Modulus. Larger extension means larger value of ##x## so to get larger value of ##x## we can increase ##F## and ##L## and decrease ##A## I am not sure whether there is change in ##F## for first and second wire so I will just assume ##F## does not change. It leaves (B) and (C) as possible options so why is (C)...

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
746
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
5K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
10K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
30
Views
8K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K